Des métaux pour lutter contre la résistance aux antimicrobiens

Nature Reviews Chemistry volume 7, pages 202–224 (2023)Cite this article

14k Accesses

12 Citations

53 Altmetric

Metrics details

Bacteria, similar to most organisms, have a love–hate relationship with metals: a specific metal may be essential for survival yet toxic in certain forms and concentrations. Metal ions have a long history of antimicrobial activity and have received increasing attention in recent years owing to the rise of antimicrobial resistance. The search for antibacterial agents now encompasses metal ions, nanoparticles and metal complexes with antimicrobial activity (‘metalloantibiotics’). Although yet to be advanced to the clinic, metalloantibiotics are a vast and underexplored group of compounds that could lead to a much-needed new class of antibiotics. This Review summarizes recent developments in this growing field, focusing on advances in the development of metalloantibiotics, in particular, those for which the mechanism of action has been investigated. We also provide an overview of alternative uses of metal complexes to combat bacterial infections, including antimicrobial photodynamic therapy and radionuclide diagnosis of bacterial infections.

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is on track to become the leading cause of death of world in the coming decades. In 2019, there were an estimated 4.95 million deaths associated with AMR, of which 1.3 million were directly attributable to resistant infections1. This number is expected to reach 10 million deaths per year worldwide by 20502, if not sooner due in part to the widespread over-prescription of antibiotics to COVID-19 patients over the past 2 years3. Despite this urgency, conventional organic medicinal chemistry has failed to replenish the depleted antimicrobial pipeline: a 2022 analysis showed that, as of June 2021, there were only 45 ‘traditional’ antibiotics in clinical development4. Hence, new approaches for developing the next generation of antibiotics are urgently needed.

Inorganic compounds, organometallic compounds, and/or metal complexes have had a small but seminal role in twentieth-century medicine. The discovery and regulatory approval of the anticancer drug cisplatin heralded the modern era of medicinal inorganic chemistry. Since then, many metal-containing compounds have been studied for the treatment of diseases, with several entering human clinical trials5. However, only recently have metals and metalloantibiotics gained considerable attention as potential antimicrobials, in response to the rapid rise of AMR in the past decade.

This Review covers the current state of metals and metalloantibiotics as antibacterial agents. We discuss the role of metal ions in bacteria and the potential of some metal ions to directly kill bacterial pathogens, along with strategies to hijack bacterial metal-ion pathways for antimicrobial activity. We focus on antibacterial metal complexes and present examples for which the mechanism of action has been (at least partially) elucidated. The Review includes a brief overview of the application of light-activated metal compounds against bacteria as an example of alternative mechanism of action that are possible with metalloantibiotics. We conclude by discussing the use of complexes of radioactive metal isotopes to improve the diagnosis of bacterial infections by visualizing their location, in a similar fashion to the detection of cancer through imaging.

This Review does not include a comprehensive list of all metalloantibiotics: interested readers are referred to excellent reviews that have been published on this topic6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16. Regiel-Futyra et al.17 recently reviewed bioinorganic strategies against bacteria. A comprehensive look at the molecular and cellular targets of metal ions was published by Lemire et al.18 in 2013. The use of metal complexes as adjuvants or potentiators, in combination with antibiotics or other biologically active compounds, is another fertile field of research, but beyond the scope of this Review. A significant body of research has been published on the use of nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents and has been reviewed elsewhere19,20. Finally, for metal-based antifungal compounds, we refer to the recent review by Lin et al.21.

Metal ions are essential for all living organisms. In bacteria, metal-ion-containing enzymes catalyse almost half of all biochemical reactions, requiring the cell to maintain homeostasis for essential metals at sufficiently high levels to meet cellular demands and low enough to avoid toxicity22. Research into the essentiality of metal ions within biological processes is ever-evolving. To date, it has been shown that the key metals required by most organisms are the first-row transition metals such as manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper and zinc23. Bacteria use specific uptake mechanisms to acquire essential metals. For example, nickel and copper are transported by NikMNQO and CbiMNQO uptake systems, respectively24. Cobalt is the centrally coordinated ion in cyclic tetrapyrroles known as corrin rings, such as the cobalamin at the centre of vitamin B12 (ref. 25). Bacterial handling of copper is believed to involve metallochaperones that deliver copper from import pumps to most bacterial cuproenzymes26. Other metals that are important, but not essential, include the redox-active transition metals molybdenum (Mo) and tungsten (W). They are incorporated into enzymes, mediate various reactions and have significant roles in supporting virulence in pathogenic bacteria27. Zinc and iron systems are described in greater detail below.

The host immune system uses several strategies that alter the homeostasis of transition metals to combat invading pathogens28,29,30,31. For example, the bacterial acquisition of iron is hindered by the host protein lipocalin, which binds to the siderophores that bacteria use to sequester iron from their environment32. Another host protein, calprotectin, appears to sequester manganese at sites of infection33, with other studies providing additional evidence that manganese is depleted around infecting bacteria by both extracellular manganese chelation and intracellular manganese transport28.

Zinc has an important role in normal host immune function34. At a cellular level, macrophages can adopt divergent strategies of both zinc starvation and zinc toxicity to kill the bacteria they engulf. Mammalian macrophages contain a range of zinc transporters that can alter their intracellular zinc concentrations. For example, upregulation of the SLC30A family that exports zinc from macrophages leads to zinc starvation of intracellular bacteria, whereas upregulation of the SLC39A family that imports zinc leads to zinc toxicity30,35,36. In response to elevated zinc concentrations, bacteria can turn on regulators such as ZntR, which induce the bacterial ZntA to export zinc; in contrast, when starved of zinc, they can activate transporter systems such as the ZnuABC ATP-binding cassette to import zinc30,37,38,39. For example, when putative zinc efflux pumps were deleted from Streptococcus pyogenes, the bacteria became more susceptible to zinc and to their killing by human neutrophils, with the addition of a zinc chelator restoring survival back to wild-type levels40. Global RNA sequencing of mouse macrophages during infection with Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium showed increases in cytosolic zinc (45 times higher than that before infection) but depletion of zinc within the phagosome. This limits the bacterial access to zinc while providing sufficient zinc for the immune response41. During Streptococcus pneumoniae infection, elevated zinc concentrations have been shown to inhibit PsaA — the manganese transport system of the bacteria — impairing the ability of bacteria to colonize the human host42,43. At a macroscopic level, the importance of host manipulation of zinc levels during bacterial infections has been highlighted by 2D elemental analysis of tissue abscesses caused by Staphylococcus aureus, which showed almost no detectable zinc (or manganese) in the abscess, in contrast with high levels in the surrounding tissue33. Zinc also has an important role in the metallo-β-lactamases that inactivate most β-lactam antibiotics, because these are zinc-dependent hydrolases44.

Iron is indispensable for bacteria, with vital roles in DNA replication, transcription, repair, biosynthesis of cofactors, ATP synthesis, nucleotide biosynthesis and so on45,46,47. However, in human hosts, free iron concentrations are extremely low (between 10−9 and 10−18 M)48 because most iron is complexed to iron-storage or iron-transport proteins. Consequently, bacteria must sequester iron from the environment of their host and transport it inside the bacterial cell to enable their survival49. These iron chelators, known as siderophores or metallophores, are produced and secreted then outcompete the iron-chelating proteins of the host (or other iron-binding factors in other environments) to solubilize and sequester iron before being reimported with their iron cargo50. Bacteria can also acquire iron by targeting the iron-containing haemoglobin of the host using haemoglobin-binding proteins and specific transporters, as recently described for Corynebacterium diphtheria51.

In summary, it is clear that careful regulation of intracellular metal concentrations is crucial for bacterial survival.

The rise in antibiotic resistance requires new strategies to develop novel antimicrobials. Given that bacteria require metal uptake for their survival and proliferation, drugs that target these uptake pathways are a promising approach. This section explores how specific metal uptake pathways in bacteria can be used and provides examples of antibiotics that use this strategy.

Metallophores are low-molecular-mass organic ligands that supply metal-ion nutrients to an organism. Thus, siderophores are metallophores with exceptionally high specificity and affinity towards iron, particularly the Fe3+ (ferric) ionic form. Several hundred different siderophores have been identified and reviewed, with different bacteria and fungi producing different types52,53,54 and with some microorganisms even using siderophores from other species55. Although structurally diverse, siderophores are typically hexadentate, containing three bidentate functional groups, such as catechols (for example, enterobactin), hydroxamates (for example, ferrioxamine B) and α-hydroxy carboxylates (for example, staphyloferrin A) (Fig. 1a), which facilitate the preferred octahedral coordination geometry of Fe3+ (ref. 56). Siderophores with reduced coordination (that is, bidentate, tridentate and tetradentate) have also been identified, but they generally exhibit lower affinity for Fe3+ than their hexadentate counterparts57,58. Siderophores can also bind the Fe2+ (that is, ferrous) form of iron, as well as other metals; however, their affinity for Fe3+ is generally much higher59,60.

a, Examples of naturally occurring metallophores with different metal-binding motifs: enterobactin, an example of a catechol-based metallophore; ferrioxamine B, an example of a hydroxamate-based metallophore and staphyloferrin A, an example of an α-hydroxy carboxylate. b, Chemical structures of metallophore–antibiotic conjugates: albomycin δ1, a naturally occurring metallophore–antibiotic; cefiderocol, one of the first synthetic metallophore–antibiotics approved for clinical use; GSK3342830, BAL30072, MC-1 and MB-1, which are synthetic metallophore–antibiotics in clinical development from various pharmaceutical companies, as well as galbofloxacin and Ent-Cipro, which are synthetic metallophore–antibiotics prepared by academic groups. The metallophore in each example is shown in blue.

Bacteria have evolved specific transport channels to ensure successful translocation of iron–metallophore complexes into cells61. This is a requirement for Gram-negative bacteria, which contain an outer membrane that prevents many molecules, such as antibiotics and other small compounds, from passively entering the cell62. In most bacteria, TonB-dependent transporters recognize specific iron–metallophore complexes and enable their passage into the cell63,64. Remarkably, to outcompete rival bacterial species, some bacteria (for example, Streptomyces sp.) have developed their own antibacterial agents that are composed of a metallophore conjugated to an antimicrobial warhead (for example, albomycin (Fig. 1b) isolated from Streptomyces griseus65), effectively deceiving the target bacteria into actively internalizing a lethal toxin65,66. This metallophore–antibiotic strategy has been termed the Trojan horse approach (Fig. 2), because the idea is reminiscent of the tactic used in Greek mythology to conquer the city of Troy.

The metallophore–antibiotic conjugate sequesters iron from its local environment and is actively transported into the bacterial cell where the antibiotic portion of the compound can act on its target.

Academia and industry have attempted to mimic nature's innovation to develop novel metallophore-based antimicrobials. However, there are several considerations that must be addressed before this can be realized: these include broadening the high bacterial specificity of many metallophores, selecting an appropriate antibiotic cargo and target location, and utilizing an appropriate linker strategy. The TonB-dependent transporters are generally highly selective for specific metallophores and will not allow the passage of structurally different metallophores67, making it difficult to generate broad-spectrum agents. The type of antibiotic is important, as the location of the antibiotic target varies, and successful uptake of the conjugate does not guarantee transport to all target locations. Most successful metallophore–antibiotic conjugates use antibiotics with periplasmic targets (such as β-lactams), because this is where metallophores are initially delivered, and the inner membrane limits their diffusion into the cytoplasm. Antibiotics with cytoplasmic targets therefore require a more complex approach that involves cleavage of the metallophore portion of the conjugate in the periplasm to allow for subsequent passage of the free antibiotic through the inner membrane. Ideally, this linker should remain stable while transported into the periplasm, but cleave upon cell entry. Several cleavable linkers have been developed and reviewed68.

Despite these limitations, the Trojan horse approach has been applied to many antibiotics, with one construct in clinical use. In 2019, cefiderocol (Shionogi & Co) became one of the first metallophore–antibiotic conjugates to be approved for clinical use when it was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and later by the European Medicines Agency (2020). Cefiderocol (Fig. 1b) is composed of a catechol (that is, a bidentate metallophore) covalently tethered via a non-cleavable linker to ceftazidime (that is, a third-generation cephalosporin). It exhibits potent activity against a range of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative clinical isolates, most of which are highly resistant to the parent compound and other β-lactams69. Several other pharmaceutical companies have progressed metallophore–antibiotic conjugates into preclinical development or clinical trials. GSK3342830 of GlaxoSmithKline (Fig. 1b), which is similar to cefiderocol, showed promising in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii70. GSK3342830 entered phase I clinical trials in 2016 but was terminated in 2018 owing to significant side effects71. Basilea Pharmaceutica created a metallophore–monobactam, BAL30072 (Fig. 1b), which displayed potent activity against several multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens72. BAL30072 began phase I clinical trials in 2010 but was abandoned because of hepatotoxicity73. Pfizer developed at least two metallophore–antibiotic conjugates on the basis of a monobactam core (MC-1 and MB-1; Fig. 1b). Both exhibited promising in vitro activity against several multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens but were not suitable for progression into clinical trials74,75,76: MC-1 was hydrolytically unstable with high plasma protein affinity74 and MB-1 exhibited low in vivo efficacy in a neutropenic murine infection model77.

Although the pharmaceutical industry has demonstrated some success with the metallophore–antibiotic approach, their reported conjugates have predominantly used only β-lactams and bidentate catechol-based metallophores. By contrast, conjugates produced by academic groups have explored a greater diversity of both metallophores and antibiotic classes, as discussed in several reviews54,78,79,80,81. For example, Miller and co-workers82 produced several hydroxamate-based metallophore–fluoroquinolone conjugates with activity against S. aureus, as well as a synthetic mixed catechol-hydroxamate metallophore–daptomycin conjugate that converted a Gram-positive antibiotic into one with potent activity against multidrug-resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates83.

Metallophore–antibiotics can use the specificity of metallophore uptake or the specificity of linker cleavage to create narrow-spectrum drugs that target specific pathogenic bacteria. This overcomes one liability of broad-spectrum antibiotics: their potential to facilitate the emergence of resistance by selecting for resistant mutants in non-pathogenic commensal bacteria, which subsequently transfer this resistance to pathogenic strains84. For example, Budzikiewicz and co-workers85,86 produced several pyoverdine-based (a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain-specific siderophore) metallophore–β-lactam conjugates, which exhibited potent activity against specific P. aeruginosa strains. In another example, Nolan and co-workers87 developed an enterobactin-based (that is, triscatecholate) metallophore–ciprofloxacin conjugate with a pathogen-specific cleavable linker, Ent-Cipro (Fig. 1b). Ent-Cipro was shown to enter via the iron-uptake pathway; however, the release of the antibiotic payload required an esterase, which is predominantly expressed in pathogenic bacteria, such as uropathogenic Escherichia coli.

Although most groups tend to use natural metallophores to develop their metallophore–antibiotic conjugates, some have found success in developing artificial metallophores. For example, Brönstrup and co-workers produced several multipurpose metallophores on the basis of the enterobactin core88,89. One was recently linked to several different antibiotics (five β-lactams and daptomycin), producing a conjugate with potent, nanomolar activity against several Gram-positive and Gram-negative multidrug-resistant pathogens89.

The ability of metallophores to complex and transport metals into bacterial cells has also led to an alternative strategy for developing antimicrobial agents: complexing other antimicrobial metals and delivering potentially lethal concentrations of them into bacterial cells. A gallium (Ga) complexed desferrichrome-based (trishydroxamate) metallophore–ciprofloxacin conjugate, galbofloxacin90,91 (Fig. 1b), exhibited higher potency against S. aureus than the parent compound (ciprofloxacin), the uncomplexed galbofloxacin derivative and even the corresponding iron-complexed galbofloxacin derivative90. This compound demonstrates how preloading metallophore–antibiotic conjugates with other metal payloads can improve potency. However, the universality of this approach remains to be demonstrated.

The susceptibility of bacteria to zinc toxicity has been leveraged for an alternative therapeutic approach, similar to the delivery of gallium described earlier. For example, the zinc ionophore PBT2 is a moderate-affinity 8-hydroxyquinoline transition metal ligand that was developed as a potential treatment for Alzheimer disease and Huntington's disease because of its ability to redistribute cobalt and zinc92 and has completed several phase II clinical trials93. A repurposing study found that the combination of PBT2 and zinc could directly kill bacteria in vitro and also act as a ‘potentiator’, re-sensitizing multidrug-resistant group A Streptococcus, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus to tetracycline, erythromycin and vancomycin, respectively, both in vitro and in vivo94. Increased bacterial cellular concentrations of zinc were observed, accompanied by disruption of iron, manganese and copper content and significant changes in heavy-metal homeostasis gene transcription. Zinc and copper efflux systems were induced, as were manganese transport systems. However, antibiotic re-sensitization was not universal, but was dependent on the antibiotic type and bacterial resistance profile. Further studies demonstrated that PBT2 overcame the intrinsic resistance of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to the lipopeptide antibiotics polymyxin B and colistin and its acquired resistance to tetracycline95. The Gram-negative potentiation activity extended to polymyxin-resistant, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing, carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, E. coli, A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa, again leading to susceptibility to colistin and polymyxin B, both in vitro and in vivo96. Increase in cellular zinc and manganese concentrations and a decrease in iron concentration were detected upon treatment of K. pneumoniae with PBT2; however, the cell size, zeta potential and membrane integrity were not affected. The ionophore approach has also been used to deliver copper, as summarized in a 2020 review97.

Metallo-β-lactamases — bacterially produced enzymes that inactivate a wide range of β-lactam antibiotics — use catalytic zinc ions in their active sites to cleave the β-lactam ring. Zinc chelators have been shown to inhibit the enzyme and restore sensitivity to carbapenem antibiotics98,99, as has a Cu-chelated analogue100. A zinc chelator has also been appended to the C terminus of the glycopeptide antibiotic vancomycin, enhancing potency by increasing binding in the vicinity of the cell-wall target via the formation of a zinc complex with pyrophosphate groups of cell-wall lipids101.

The use of free metal ions to kill bacteria and fungi has longstanding historical precedent. Some of the metal compounds described in the next section, particularly those without strong complexation of the metal, may, in fact, simply act as delivery agents for metal ions. However, metal-resistance genes have been reported among environmental bacteria that have been exposed to high metal concentrations in highly polluted industrial soils102,103,104 or in agricultural soil irrigated with polluted water105.

Silver is the metal with the greatest association with antimicrobial activity, both historically and currently106,107,108,109. Various medical products include silver, such as bandages, ointments and catheters110. Nanocrystalline silver (silver nanoparticles and colloidal silver), silver nitrate111 and silver sulfadiazine (a complex with the antibiotic sulfadiazine)112 are commonly used. Despite the different forms, Ag+ ions are generally believed to be the active component. The antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles varies with size, shape and surface characteristics (including surface coatings), but these differences are likely due to changes in the release kinetics of Ag+ ions and not because of the particles themselves113. Silver is often synergistic in vitro with a range of antibiotics, such as ampicillin114,115, tobramycin116, gentamicin115,117, ofloxacin115, cefotaxime117, ceftazidime117, meropenem117 and ciprofloxacin117.

A 2019 meta-analysis of high-quality studies on the use of silver in wound care found potential short-term benefits when nanocrystalline silver was used to treat infected wounds, but delayed healing in burns treated with silver sulfadiazine. Overall, the analysis found that the quality of the published research on silver was poor118. Similarly, the efficacy of antimicrobial nanoparticles in their wound-healing abilities has been called into question119. The reputation of silver is further tarnished by widespread, unsupported claims of benefits of colloidal silver (which is regulated by the FDA as a dietary supplement) by social influencers and by companies marketing these products120,121. However, antimicrobial applications of silver have crept into a range of consumer applications, such as socks, deodorants and antibacterial coatings on products, such as refrigerators. By 2025, the annual global production of silver nanoparticles is estimated to reach 400–800 tonnes122, raising concerns over the long-term effects of environmental exposure123. In particular, resistance to Ag+ ions has been identified124,125. A study of 444 clinical isolates found no overt Ag+ resistance, but upon challenge with silver nitrate, over 50% of Enterobacter spp. and Klebsiella spp. (but not E. coli, P. aeruginosa, Acinetobacter spp., Citrobacter spp. or Proteus spp.) gained high levels of resistance (>128 mg l−1). Resistance appeared to be due to a single missense mutation in silS — a gene related to the expression of the sil operon that encodes efflux pumps (SilCBA and SilP) and Ag+ chaperone or binding proteins (SilF and SilE)125,126. Another study has shown that P. aeruginosa inactivates Ag+ by reduction to non-toxic Ag0 via the production of the redox-active metabolite, pyocyanin127. A 2022 genetics study found that silver nanoparticles did not speed up resistance mutation in E. coli and led to a reduction in the expression of quorum sensing molecules, but that resistance was acquired through two-component regulatory systems involved in processes such as metal detoxification, osmoregulation and energy metabolism128.

The exact mechanism by which silver compounds cause bacterial death has yet to be clearly defined. It is likely that several mechanisms are involved and that they vary subtly, depending on the form in which the silver is delivered. Four mechanisms have consistently been identified, as reviewed in detail in 2013 (ref. 109), 2016 (ref. 129) and more succinctly in 2020 (ref. 106). These four mechanisms involve: effects on the cell wall or membrane; interactions with DNA; binding or inhibition of enzymes and membrane proteins and the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS is a somewhat controversial130,131,132,133 mechanism of bacterial killing that may directly result from exposure to multiple classes of antibiotics or may be a by-product of other antibiotic-induced effects134. Most of these mechanisms were identified in a 2013 study examining the effects of silver nitrate on E. coli115. An increased concentration of hydroxyl radicals was detected, indicating increased ROS that might result from Ag+ causing the release of Fe2+ from FeS clusters. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed substantial morphological changes in the cell envelope, with an increase in membrane permeability supported by increased uptake of the membrane-impermeant dye propidium iodide. TEM also indicated protein aggregation, suggesting protein misfolding, which might arise from Ag+ replacing the hydrogen atom in cysteine thiol (–SH) side chain and disrupting disulfide bond formation. This study suggested that the misfolded proteins might lead to membrane permeability. Similar effects were observed in the 2019 study135 examining the effects of cationic silver nanoparticles on S. aureus. More specifically, scanning electron microscopy showed extensive damage to the bacterial cell membrane with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis, indicating intracellular content leakage. Silver–protein interactions were indicated by enzymatic inhibition of respiratory chain dehydrogenase activity, and agarose gel electrophoresis revealed DNA degradation or inhibition of replication.

The binding of silver to proteins has been elucidated in a series of recent studies. In 2019, Wang et al.136 used liquid chromatography gel electrophoresis inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LC-GE-ICP-MS) to identify 34 proteins from E. coli that directly bind silver. Ag+ was found to initially damage several enzymes involved in glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle, with subsequent damage to the adaptive glyoxylate pathway and suppression of the cellular responses to oxidative stress. Examination of Ag+ binding to one enzyme in the glycolysis pathway — glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase — revealed that Ag+ inhibited enzyme activity. Moreover, X-ray crystallography showed three bound Ag+ ions, one of which was bound to Cys at the catalytic site137. The same methodology was applied to S. aureus, with 38 silver-binding proteins identified138. Glycolysis was again the major pathway affected, leading to depleted ATP. Damage to the oxidative-stress defence system was also identified, which increased the concentration of ROS. A third affected pathway — the oxidative branch of the pentose phosphate pathway — includes the enzyme 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase. X-ray crystallography showed Ag+ binding with complexation with the catalytic His185 (ref. 138). Another X-ray study focusing on E. coli malate dehydrogenase indicated four Ag+ binding sites with a strong preference for Cys, but also including coordination to S, N and O from the side chains of Met, His and Lys, and the peptide backbone139. One specific protein interaction that has been identified is with urease, a nickel-dependent enzyme found in many organisms, including a number of pathogenic bacteria that use urease as a virulence factor to help colonization and survival. A crystal structure of Sporosarcina pasteurii urease showed that a cysteine thiol, a methionine thioether and a histidine imidazole ring coordinate a bimetallic cluster of Ag+ ions, which affects a protein loop near the active site, rather than the nickel-binding site itself140.

Genetics-based studies can provide insight into the mechanisms involved in bacterial resistance. One analysis in 2018 (ref. 141) used the Keio collection of 3,810 E. coli mutants, each with a deleted non-essential gene, to help decipher the pathways involved in silver sensitivity and resistance. Several mechanisms were identified following low but prolonged exposure to silver on solid minimal media, including genes involved in iron–sulfur clusters, cellular redox enzymes, cell-wall maintenance, quinone metabolism and sulfur assimilation. Similar studies have been conducted for other metals, as described subsequently.

Copper is another metal with historical antimicrobial use, with applications involving potential antimicrobial activity reported hundreds, if not thousands, of years ago142. More recently, copper-based paints are widely used to prevent fouling on the hulls of ships. Copper is also the only hard surface material that has been approved by the US Environmental Protection Agency to provide antimicrobial effects143. As highlighted in a previous review144, a promising biomedical application of copper is a CuZn-colloid-impregnated bandage, which showed greater reduction in S. aureus than a range of silver-based dressings. Similar mechanisms of action have been proposed for the two metals. Copper, similar to silver, has been tested in combination with antibiotics and has shown synergy with the antifungal agent gatifloxacin145 and the antitubercular drugs capreomycin146 and disulfiram147; for disulfiram, no other bivalent transition metals (for example, Fe2+, Ni2+, Mn2+ and Co2+) were effective. One study has shown that the bacterial toxicity of copper may be related to its effects on the stability of folded proteins — both increased and decreased — with proteins involved with the ribosome and protein biosynthesis, and cell-redox homeostasis particularly affected148. A 2021 study149 used the Keio collection of E. coli mutants (3,985 single deletions for this study compared with the one described earlier for silver) and compared the results with those previously reported for silver (discussed earlier) and gallium (discussed subsequently). Notably, distinct differences were seen, including variations in the genes involved in the same process, such as different subunits in transporters. CueO — a copper oxidase — was the only protein identified that was directly involved in copper homeostasis. The TolC efflux pump was shown to be important in mitigating copper sensitivity. The use of copper can lead to resistance, with horizontal transfer of genes encoding for copper resistance reported in S. aureus and Listeria monocytogenes150.

Because the immune system uses zinc to kill bacteria, it is not surprising that studies have examined direct antibacterial applications of zinc151, particularly in the form of zinc oxide nanoparticles152. As with silver, it appears to be the release of Zn2+ from the nanoparticles that is responsible for its activity153. Antibacterial activity of other metals has also been reported9. For example, although much less commonly studied than silver, both gold154,155 and platinum156,157 nanoparticles can exhibit antibacterial properties; however, the effects of gold nanoparticles appear to be dependent on surface functionalization, which adds another layer of complexity to understanding their activity158.

Bismuth subsalicylate (Pepto-Bismol), colloidal bismuth subcitrate (De-Nol) and ranitidine bismuth citrate (Pylorid) are used to treat Helicobacter pylori gastrointestinal infections. Antimicrobial activity for bismuth subgallate, bismuth subnitrate and colloidal bismuth tartrate has also been reported159. Despite being used for gastrointestinal infections since 1900, the structure of bismuth subsalicylate was only identified in 2022 (ref. 160). Colloidal bismuth subcitrate was also found to inhibit metallo-β-lactamase enzymes and restore the in vivo efficacy of meropenem161.

Antimicrobial properties of gallium also have longstanding recognition162,163, with a 1931 study showing gallium tartrate eliminating syphilis in rabbits and Trypanosoma evansi in mice164; gallium nitrate has been reported to have activity against a range of bacteria162, including P. aeruginosa, A. baumannii and Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and there is an FDA-approved formulation of gallium nitrate (that is, Ganite) for other indications. As mentioned earlier, the similarity of gallium to iron means that it can be taken up by metallophores; however, Ga3+ within iron-dependent enzymes cannot be reduced to Ga2+, which blocks enzyme activity. Application of genetic screening with the Keio collection of E. coli mutants found deletion of genes controlling oxidative stress, DNA or iron–sulfur cluster repair, or nucleotide biosynthesis led to increased sensitivity to gallium, whereas deletion of genes related to iron or siderophore import, amino acid biosynthesis and cell-wall maintenance led to reduced susceptibility165.

In contrast to freely solvated metal ions or metal nanoparticles, a metal complex is a well-defined arrangement of ligands (organic and/or inorganic) around one or more metal centres. These compounds stand out, as their properties can be manipulated in ways similar to those used in conventional drug development. This section discusses some features of metal complexes that differentiate them from purely organic drug candidates and highlights several concrete cases of promising metal complexes possessing antibacterial activity — metalloantibiotics.

There is great diversity of properties among metals and near infinite possibilities and combinations of ligands. The number of ligands attached to a metal centre (that is, the coordination number) can range from as low as 1 to up to 28 (ref. 166). This range of coordination numbers leads to a rich and three-dimensionally diverse variety of structures of metal complexes (Fig. 3). In contrast, because carbon generally does not form more than four bonds, the geometrical diversity of organic molecules is lower. For example, a recent study by Cohen and co-workers167 compared the 3D structures of organic fragments used in fragment-based drug discovery with a small library of metallofragments (that is, fragments based on inert metal complexes). They evaluated the shape diversity of the compounds through analysis of the normalized principle moment of inertia. This analysis showed that the small library of 71 metal compounds covered a much larger portion of the available 3D fragment space than the 18,534 organic fragments from the ZINC database, which contains commercially available organic compounds and is therefore useful for virtual screening167. This metallofragment library was also shown to produce hits in a screening assay against viral, bacterial and human protein targets. Altogether, the rich structural variety of metal complexes makes them interesting and hitherto underexplored starting points for the development of lead molecules for challenging biological targets. This is of potential relevance in medicinal chemistry, in which the increasing predominance of achiral, aromatic compounds has led to calls to ‘escape from flatland’ (that is, to make compounds with structures that extend in all three dimensions), because the complexity and use of chiral centres correlate with higher target selectivity with reduced off-target effects, leading to greater success in transitioning from discovery, through clinical testing, to becoming drugs168,169.

The compounds shown contain chromium281, manganese176, iron282, cobalt283, copper284, zinc177, gallium90, ruthenium177, rhodium285, palladium286, silver287, tungsten288, rhenium289, osmium290, iridium291, platinum292 or gold293.

In addition to their diverse geometries, metal complexes also have access to a range of different mechanisms of action. These include: redox reactions; the generation of ROS or catalytic generation of other active species; ligand exchange or triggered ligand release and competitive or covalent inhibition of enzymes or binding to proteins. Many of these are difficult — if not impossible — to achieve with organic compounds. Some of these alternative modes of action against bacteria are discussed throughout later sections of this Review. For a comprehensive review of the mechanism of action accessible to metal complexes, the reader is referred to a recent review by Boros et al.170.

The antibacterial properties of metal complexes were noted early in the history of modern inorganic medicinal chemistry. For example, the antibacterial properties of simple ruthenium complexes were reported in 1952 (ref. 171). The antiproliferative properties of platinum complexes that led to the development and approval of the anticancer drug cisplatin were first observed in E. coli bacteria in 1965 (ref. 172). Since those publications, there has been a slow but steady stream of reports on the antibacterial properties of metal complexes, with a marked increase in the past decade. However, the majority simply describe in vitro activity measurements against a few species of bacteria, without detailed investigation into their mechanism of action or their potential to be advanced as antibiotic drug candidates (for example, with toxicity and/or stability studies). In addition, very few metalloantibiotics have been evaluated in in vivo animal models173,174,175,176.

In 2020, we took advantage of the large number of metal complexes screened as part of the Community for Open Antimicrobial Drug Discovery (CO-ADD) Initiative and compared the ability of metal complexes to inhibit bacterial growth with that of purely organic molecules177. At the time, CO-ADD had screened over 295,000 compounds, including close to 1,000 metal-containing ones. Our analysis revealed that the metal-containing compounds had hit rates against critical ESKAPE pathogens that were more than 10 times higher than those of the rest of the molecules in the CO-ADD database. Importantly, we also compared the frequency of cytotoxicity (for mammalian cell lines) and haemolysis (for human red blood cells) of the two classes of compound and found no significant difference between the two classes for either toxicity measure. In addition to demonstrating the enormous potential of metal complexes as antimicrobial agents, this work provides evidence to refute the common perception that metal complexes are inherently more toxic than organic molecules.

With their potential as the next generation of antimicrobials established, it has become more important to understand how metal complexes are able to elicit their antibacterial effects. Unfortunately, the already small number of studies on metalloantibiotics decreases even further once one filters for those that investigate the mechanism of action of these compounds. In the following sections, we provide a curated selection of the most detailed studies to date on the mechanism of action of antibacterial metal complexes. We note that determining the mechanism of action of antibiotics is not trivial, particularly when more than one mechanism may be involved; for example, new mechanisms are still being proposed for polymyxin antibiotics, which were first used clinically in the 1950s (ref. 178).

One of the first detailed mechanism-of-action investigations for metalloantibiotics was undertaken by the groups of Bandow and Metzler-Nolte. They described the preparation of a trimetallic complex containing rhenium, iron and manganese with a peptide nucleic acid backbone (Re1; Fig. 4). This compound showed good activity against a range of Gram-positive bacteria including MRSA, vancomycin-intermediate S. aureus and Bacillus subtilis, but no activity against the tested Gram-negative pathogens179,180. In addition to in-depth mechanistic studies, a thorough investigation of the structure–activity relationship was carried out, which demonstrated that the Re-containing [(dpa)Re(CO)3] moiety was essential for activity, but the ferrocenyl and CpMn(CO)3 units could be replaced by non-metal moieties, such as a phenyl ring181.

Antibiotics can act by a number of different mechanisms. Unfortunately, there are relatively few metalloantibiotics for which the mechanism of action has been studied in detail. Illustrated here are the targets of compounds Re1, Re2, Ru1, Ru2 and auranofin. DHPS, dihydropteroate synthase; DHFR, dihydrofolate reductase; TrxR, thioredoxin reductase; mRNA, messenger RNA294.

Ferrocene fragments can generate ROS in biological systems through redox cycling. In the case of the antimalaria drug candidate ferroquine, this enhances its activity against resistant malaria strains182. To study the contribution of the ferrocene moiety to the antibacterial activity, an analogue containing ruthenocene, which does not undergo redox cycling, was synthesized and tested. The compound had similar activity against the S. aureus strains but lower activity against B. subtilis, indicating that the ferrocene moiety contributes only partially to the observed activity of the original compound Re1. Through systematic replacement of the metal-containing moieties in Re1 with simple organic functions, the authors demonstrated that the rhenium moiety of the compound was essential for the observed activity, whereas both ferrocene and manganese fragments could be replaced without appreciable loss of antibacterial activity.

Proteomic profiling was conducted with both Re1 and the ruthenocene-containing analogue, revealing similar general responses179. Several marker proteins for cell-envelope stress, energy or central metabolism and general stress response (for example, YceC, PspA and NadE) were upregulated for both compounds. Notably, oxidative-stress proteins were only upregulated for the ferrocene-containing Re1. Cellular assays revealed some ROS formation on treatment with Re1 but not with the ruthenium-containing analogue. However, the lack of antibacterial activity of the ferrocene-containing analogues of Re1 without the rhenium moiety indicates that ROS formation is not the main mechanism of this compound. Atomic absorption spectroscopy demonstrated accumulation of the metal compound in the membrane of treated bacteria. Monitoring of membrane-potential-dependent localization of the cell division protein MinD revealed that treatment Re1 led to membrane depolarization; however, further assays showed that the compound did not form large pores in the membrane (that is, the mechanism of some other membrane-active antibiotics). Monitoring of cytosolic ATP levels revealed that both Re1 and the ruthenocene analogue caused a significant reduction in relative ATP levels. However, this change did not correlate with the activity levels of the compounds, so it is not clear whether this is relevant to how they work. Overall, these assays provide a convincing case for the cytoplasmic membrane as a target structure of Re1, but the precise molecular target (targets) of the compound remains unknown at this stage.

The repeated occurrence of the M(CO)3 fragment (M = Mn (refs. 176,183,184,185,186,187), Re (refs. 174,175,188,189) and W (ref. 190)) in reported metalloantibiotics suggests that it has a crucial role in imparting the observed biological effects. In 2022, Mendes et al. investigated the structure–activity relationships of a series of manganese and rhenium tricarbonyl compounds, which, inspired by earlier work191, contained the antifungal drug clotrimazole as the axial ligand192. Most of the prepared compounds displayed some degree of activity against the Gram-positive S. aureus, but, in line with previous work on M(CO)3-type compounds, no significant activity against Gram-negative E. coli and S. enterica was observed (although a decrease in growth was noted for these strains). The structure of the bidentate ligand seemed to have an important effect on the activity of the complexes, with bulkier ligands resulting in reduced antibacterial activity. The analogous rhenium and manganese complexes without the clotrimazole axial ligand showed no effect against S. aureus. Clotrimazole alone was less active than the most active metal compounds, emphasizing that the combination of metal core and ligand was crucial for optimal activity.

In the aforementioned study192, the rhenium complex Re2 (Fig. 4) was selected for further mechanism-of-action studies because it had the highest activity, was stable in blood and did not release carbon monoxide. Bioreporter profiling in a specifically designed reference strain (B. subtilis 168) revealed that Re2 attacked the cytoplasmic membrane and potentially interfered with peptidoglycan synthesis. Studies with different fluorescent dyes excluded membrane depolarization and general impairment of the membrane barrier function as the mechanism of action of Re2. Analysis of cytoplasmic levels of UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid-pentapeptide — a soluble peptidoglycan precursor — revealed that the Re2 caused a strong increase of this precursor (no increase was caused by clotrimazole or the rhenium precursor), suggesting inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis as a likely mechanism of action. Because UDP-N-acetylmuramic acid-pentapeptide is the last cytoplasmic peptidoglycan precursor, the authors focused on the later, membrane-associated, stages of the peptidoglycan biosynthesis. They found that Re2 showed moderate inhibition of lipid II formation in vitro. The use of individual, purified, recombinant enzymes of the metabolic cascade revealed that Re2 could inhibit the MurG-mediated conversion of lipid I to lipid II. Altogether, the evidence suggests that Re2 inhibits peptidoglycan synthesis by complexating lipid I, lipid II and undecaprenyl-pyrophosphate C55PP. However, the observation of dye aggregation upon exposure of bacteria to Re2 is not typical for peptidoglycan synthesis inhibitors, suggesting that there are additional targets for Re2. The amount of work described in this study illustrates the difficulty in readily ascertaining the real mechanism of action of novel compounds.

A liability of Re2 is its cytotoxicity against several human cell lines. However, Sovari et al.175 recently reported a series of new antimicrobial Re(CO)3 complexes with improved activity. Some of these showed no in vivo toxicity in zebrafish embryos and high efficacy (that is, reduced bacterial load and increased survival) in a zebrafish MRSA infection model.

In parallel to the aforementioned studies into the rhenium carbonyl complexes as antimicrobials, several studies in the past decade have highlighted the promising antibacterial properties of ruthenium polypyridyl complexes. In particular, dinuclear ruthenium complexes are among the most intriguing classes of new metalloantibiotics173,193. In 2011, Collins and Keene194 reported the antimicrobial activity of inert oligonuclear polypyridylruthenium complexes. They found that dinuclear ruthenium complexes bearing phenanthroline ligands linked by long alkyl chains exhibited good activity (minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) as low as 1–8 µg ml−1; Box 1) against both Gram-positive (that is, S. aureus and MRSA) and Gram-negative (that is, E. coli and P. aeruginosa) bacteria. Analogous tri-nuclear and tetra-nuclear complexes195 and dinuclear compounds bearing a labile chloride ligand196 also exhibited antimicrobial properties, with the highest activity observed for the dinuclear complex with the longest bridging ligand197 (Ru1; Fig. 4). There was no statistically significant difference between the antibacterial activity of the ΔΔ-isomers and ΛΛ-isomers of Ru1, indicating that the mechanism of action does not involve specific interactions with chiral receptors, such as proteins. The authors observed some haemolysis for dinuclear compounds, which correlated with increasing chain length between the two metal centres (HC50 (concentration at which 50% haemolysis is observed) = 22 µg ml−1 = 13.5 µM for Ru1). A similar trend, albeit milder, was observed for cytotoxicity against THP-1 cells (CC50 (concentration causing 50% cell death) = 40 µg ml−1 = 25 µM for Ru1). Overall, these complexes resulted in therapeutic indices ranging between 10 and 100, depending on the bacterial strains and cell lines considered193.

Because of the inherent fluorescent properties of this class of compounds, their bacterial uptake can be determined by measuring the fluorescence remaining in the culture supernatant after removing the bacteria by centrifugation. It was shown that the bacterial uptake of these compounds correlated with their activity, with Ru1 showing the highest uptake across Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains (with generally lower uptake in Gram-negative bacteria)198. In other studies199,200, widefield fluorescence microscopy was used to investigate the intracellular localization of Ru1, revealing that the compound co-localized with bacterial ribosomes. Although ruthenium complexes with large, flat polypyridyl ligands are generally good intercalators for DNA, no significant interaction with DNA was observed199,200. These studies also suggested that the complex was able to condense the multiribosome assemblies known as polysomes, thereby stopping bacterial growth. Polysome chains are anionic and have a higher negative charge density than DNA. Therefore, they possess a higher affinity than DNA for polycationic species, such as Ru1. In eukaryotic cells, the ruthenium complex was found to accumulate in mitochondria. The authors hypothesized that the lower toxicity observed in these cells was owing to the ribosomes being membrane-associated, which could prevent the condensation triggered by Ru1 binding201.

Solid-state NMR and molecular dynamics simulations202 revealed that dinuclear ruthenium complexes with long linkers could be incorporated into negatively charged model bacterial membranes; however, with charge-neutral eukaryotic membranes, they only bound to the surface. This study found no evidence of bacterial membrane lytic activity, indicating that membrane insertion did not lead to pore formation. Instead, membrane insertion may contribute to the observed antibacterial activity in other ways, for example, by facilitating cellular uptake or leading to the disruption of other membrane-based processes.

In 2019, Thomas and co-workers described a different family of dinuclear ruthenium complexes, bridged by a (tetrapyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c:3′′,2′′-h:2′′′,3′′′-j]phenazine) polypyridyl ligand203 (Ru2; Fig. 4). These compounds were previously identified as excellent fluorescent probes for DNA, with good uptake into bacterial cells204. Compound Ru2 had high activity against Gram-negative bacteria, including a uropathogenic (EC958) E. coli strain. The activity was determined in two different types of media: glucose-defined minimal media and nutrient-rich Mueller–Hinton II media. Ru2 — like most other compounds tested — showed lower activity against EC958 in Mueller–Hinton II media (MIC = 1.6 µM) than the glucose-defined minimal media (MIC = 5.6 µM). The differential activity observed in different media demonstrates that the media type needs to be considered when evaluating and comparing reported in vitro assay results: bacteria are more resistant to killing when they are grown in a medium supporting their growth. Promisingly, the complex showed low cytotoxicity against human embryonic kidney-293 cells (IC50 = 135 µM), providing a higher therapeutic index than the alkyl-chain-linked ruthenium compounds described earlier. A study evaluating the ability for Ru2 to select for resistance against the EC958 strain via a 5-week serial passage assay revealed a fourfold to eightfold increase in the MIC of Ru2. However, this increase MIC was not stable, as when regrown in the absence of Ru2 and then retested, the same MIC as the wild-type strain was obtained. This suggests that the resistance was not caused by mutations, but by altered gene expression after extended exposure, which is reset upon growth in the absence of antibiotic pressure205. Toxicity testing in a Galleria mellonella larva showed that doses of Ru2 up to 80 mg kg−1 were not toxic203.

Cellular uptake of Ru2 was monitored using inductively coupled plasma-absorbance emission spectroscopy to determine the ruthenium levels in E. coli cells206. Some glucose dependency was observed in the uptake, indicating initial active (that is, energy-dependent) transport of the compound into the cells. The fluorescent properties of the compound were then used to conduct super-resolution microscopy, revealing that Ru2 initially accumulated in the bacterial membrane for up to 20 min, but then migrated to the cell poles. This finding coincides with the earlier work by the groups of Collins and Keene194 that identified localization with RNA-rich polysomes. Ru2 was also found to permeabilize the bacterial membrane, as indicated by uptake of a dye that is normally incapable of permeating the membranes of intact bacteria, ATP leakage assays and TEM.

In the subsequent work, Varney et al.205 conducted a transcriptomic analysis in the reference strain E. coli EC958 with Ru2. Nine target genes were monitored by quantitative PCR at different time points after exposure (ompF, spy, sdhA, yrbF, ycfR, ibpA, recN, recA and umuC). These genes were selected because they have functional roles in membrane permeability and stability and in DNA repair. The expression of three of the nine genes showed a significant difference in response to Ru2 exposure. The activity of the ompF gene, which encodes a non-specific porin in E. coli, decreased following exposure. However, there was no difference in the MIC for Ru2 treatment between knockout mutants with ompF and ompF-ompC deletions and the wild-type strain. This suggests that the attempt of bacteria at preventing the effect of Ru2 by reducing the expression of passive transport porins is ineffective. This is likely because the molecular weight limit of porins in E. coli (~600 Da)207 is exceeded by Ru2. A statistically significant increase in expression of the chaperone gene spy was observed. Spy and related chaperones are crucial to maintaining proper protein folding conditions under harsh conditions in bacteria. Lastly, a decrease in activity of the sdhA gene was detected after 2 h of exposure to Ru2. This gene encodes the succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit A, which is a key protein in the tricarboxylic acid cycle which is an important part of aerobic respiration. Genes involved in the aerobic respiration in E. coli have also been shown to be downregulated in other studies with ruthenium complexes208. After 2 h, uptake studies showed that Ru2 penetrated the membranes in E. coli. Downregulation of metabolic pathways may be a stress response by the bacteria to preserve energy. Overall, the detailed transcriptomic analysis paints a detailed picture of the action of Ru2, suggesting that the complex causes damage to both bacterial membranes in addition to previously mentioned activity on ribosomes.

In the studies described earlier, Ru2 showed better activity against Gram-negative bacteria than against the Gram-positive S. aureus. This was recently explored in more detail by Smitten et al.206. An extensive set of experiments led to the conclusion that teichoic acids, a common glycopolymer in the membrane of Gram-positive (but not Gram-negative) bacteria, bind Ru2, thereby preventing its accumulation inside Gram-positive bacteria. Three-dimensional stimulated emission depletion nanoscopy showed that Ru2 accumulated mostly at the cell wall and membrane of Gram-positive bacteria. Upregulation of mprF is an established resistance mechanism that leads to a higher overall positive charge of the outer surface of S. aureus, thereby reducing its susceptibility towards cationic antibiotics. Indeed, the activity of Ru2 was >25 higher against an mprF knockout mutant. On the basis of these findings, the authors speculated that the complex binds teichoic acids and other negatively charged cell-wall components in Gram-positive bacteria, preventing intracellular accumulation at concentrations necessary for optimal bacterial killing206. The extensive experiments required to come to these conclusions, which still do not provide a definitive mechanism of action, again highlight the difficulty and complexity in determining how novel antibiotics kill bacteria.

Mononuclear ruthenium complexes with antibacterial properties have also been reported173,193. Complexes based on tetrapyridophenazine and dipyridophenazine ligands were active against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, but, unlike the related dinuclear analogues, did not damage bacterial membranes, with no ATP release seen and with a minimal effect on membrane potential. The best compound was rapidly taken up in a glucose-independent manner, with imaging by super-resolution nanoscopy and TEM showing intracellular localization at the bacterial DNA, with co-localization with a DNA-targeting, fluorescent probe (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole)173. It remains to be seen whether there are any significant advantages or disadvantages in pursuing mononuclear or dinuclear complexes, with the more advanced studies to date concentrating on dinuclear examples.

The rhenium and ruthenium complexes discussed earlier are by far the metalloantibiotics that have been studied to the greatest extent. Future development needs to focus on optimizing the properties such as solubility, stability and cytotoxicity, while maintaining or improving the original antibacterial activity. More importantly, the efficacy and safety of these compounds need to be proven in in vivo models. Once a lead compound with favourable properties has demonstrated the ability to cure bacterial infections in vivo at a dose with a sufficient therapeutic index, the difficult road towards clinical application in patients (or potentially animals) can be approached.

A number of methodologies are used to assess the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), which is conventionally reported as µg ml−1 or mg l−1 rather than in molarity, presumably because of the historical isolation of antibiotics as complex natural product mixtures. The MIC depends on factors that differ for each microorganism tested, such as the type of medium and plate; volume of the medium (that is, MIC can be performed as a microdilution or macrodilution); the quantity of the microorganism used initially (inoculum) and the length of incubation. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)301 and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST)302 provide comprehensive guidelines for standardized testing.

The in vitro MIC required for an antibiotic is subjective and is directly linked to its toxicity and pharmacokinetic profile, as an antibiotic with an MIC of 16 µg ml−1 or higher may still be able to be developed as a drug if it is non-toxic at high concentrations and is able to achieve a high systemic concentration. Nevertheless, most approved antibiotics have MIC values around 1–2 µg ml−1 or less, so this is a rough benchmark for ‘good’ activity.

Broth dilution or broth microdilution MIC is the most common assay for MIC testing. These assays involve twofold serial dilutions of the tested compound in a broth medium containing an inoculum of the microorganism. Microdilution assays are conducted in a microtitre plate, with the plate incubated at 35 ± 2 °C for 16–24 h (longer for some yeasts and filamentous fungi). Microorganism growth is indicated by a cloudy solution, which can be visualized with the naked eye or quantified using optical density (for example, at 600 nm = OD600 for bacteria) in a spectrophotometer.

Another common assay is agar dilution. In agar dilution, the compound to be tested is combined with melted agar to produce plates with a twofold dilution series of the compound. The microorganism is added as a spot to each plate, using a defined inoculum. After incubation, visual examination determines the lowest concentration at which microorganism growth has occurred. This method allows for multiple types of microorganisms to be tested on one plate.

A less rigorous method to assess antimicrobial activity is the disc-diffusion assay. In this method, an agar plate is uniformly coated with an inoculum of microorganism, and a paper disc soaked with a solution of the test compound is placed on the surface. After incubation, the ‘zone of inhibition’ (any clear area around the disc where the bacteria have not grown enough to be visible) can be measured. However, the size of the zone does not necessarily correlate with relative antimicrobial potency, because it is also affected by the diffusion characteristics of a molecule.

The gold-based compound auranofin is an FDA-approved drug for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis that has recently been investigated for other applications, such as for the treatment of cancer and AIDS, as well as bacterial infections209. Auranofin is a potent inhibitor of thioredoxin reductase (TrxR) — a crucial enzyme that works in conjunction with glutathione and glutathione reductase to control the redox environment in the cell210. Loss of one of the two enzymes can generally be compensated by the other, and only knockout of both systems results in lethality. However, many Gram-positive bacteria (for example, S. aureus and certain Bacillus spp.), the Gram-negative H. pylori and the intermediate species M. tuberculosis lack the conventional glutathione–glutathione reductase couple, which is present in most Gram-negative species. Therefore, the thioredoxin–TrxR couple is often essential in these organisms. In recent work, auranofin was found to have activity against M. tuberculosis and a series of S. aureus and B. subtilis strains in vitro210, but did not possess significant activity against Gram-negative pathogens. In further assays, the authors demonstrated that auranofin inhibited the isolated TrxR enzymes of both M. tuberculosis and S. aureus and that the concentration of free thiols decreased substantially upon treatment of bacteria with auranofin. In addition, an E. coli mutant lacking glutathione displayed increased sensitivity towards auranofin, furthering the case that TrxR is the molecular target of the compound. Promisingly, auranofin maintained its antibacterial activity in an in vivo murine systemic infection model of S. aureus. Although the compound showed elevated cytotoxicity levels in vitro (HepG2 CC50 = 4.5 µM), the fact that it is FDA-approved with a safe profile even upon daily usage in patients highlights its potential as an antibacterial drug in the future. Several recent studies have explored other derivatives of auranofin with the goal of improving its activity profile and lowering its toxicity211,212,213,214,215.

In addition to being triggered by bacteria-internal stimuli, some classes of antimicrobial metal compounds can also be activated by external triggers such as light in photodynamic therapy (PDT). PDT requires two fundamental components: a light source and a photosensitizer. The photosensitizer absorbs photons from the light source and enters an excited state, from which it can then either directly react with its environment (for example, cellular components) and cause damage or transform surrounding molecules (such as oxygen and water) into ROS (Fig. 5). PDT has been widely used in cancer therapy, with several organic drugs receiving regulatory approval for clinical use216,217. In the past decade, metal-based photosensitizers have gained prominence because their photophysical and biological properties can be finely tuned218. Research in this area has culminated in one ruthenium complex being evaluated in a phase II clinical trial for the treatment of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer219. Tumours are a suitable target for PDT because they are generally localized in one specific area where the light irradiation can be controlled with high spatial and temporal control. Although this is not applicable for systemic infections, antimicrobial PDT has been explored for the treatment of localized infections, such as those resulting from burn wounds, diabetic foot ulcers and skin and urinary tract infections220,221,222. For an overview on the latest progress in photosensitizer design in antimicrobial PDT, the reader is referred to a recent review223. A potential advantage of antimicrobial PDT is that it is a multifaceted attack against pathogens that is not limited to a singular molecular target. This increases the difficulty for bacteria to develop resistance to this treatment modality224.

A metal photosensitizer (PS) is activated from its ground state to a singlet excited state upon light irradiation. Through intersystem crossing (ISC), an excited triplet state is reached, which can transfer either an electron to surrounding biological substrates (type 1 mechanism) or energy to surrounding oxygen (type 2 mechanism), generating a suite of reactive species that can kill nearby bacteria. Energy can also be dissipated through internal conversion (IC), fluorescence or phosphorescence. M, metal; ROS, reactive oxygen species; S or 1, singlet state; T or 3, triplet state; hν, photon energy, where h is Planck's constant and ν is the frequency of light.

Porphyrins and related heterocyclic macrocycles have had major roles as photosensitizers in both anticancer and antibacterial PDT. Many groups have reported improved photophysical and biological properties for these molecules upon metal coordination; several example structures are shown in Fig. 6. Extensive reviews have been published elsewhere on this class of metal complexes225,226,227. Probably inspired by their success in anticancer PDT, ruthenium complexes have been among the most explored for this application228,229,230,231,232,233. In 2014, one of the first ruthenium photosensitizer agents was reported to show in vitro activity against S. aureus and E. coli, with a large reduction in colony-forming units upon light irradiation, but low activity in the dark234. Reports also exist for complexes containing iridium235,236,237, platinum238,239, copper240 and rhenium188,231 (Fig. 7).

The macrocyclic compounds, which are generally highly positively charged, can contain various different metals such as iron295, lutetium296, palladium297, zinc298 or aluminium299. Ac, acetate.

Various metals and ligand assemblies have the potential to be used as antibacterial photodynamic therapy agents. In general, aromatic conjugated ligands are used to fine-tune the photophysical properties of the resulting metal complex. Examples containing the metals ruthenium (PS-Ru1, ref. 234; PS-Ru2, ref. 300), iridium (PS-Ir1, ref. 235), platinum (PS-Pt1, refs. 238,239), copper (PS-Cu1, ref. 240) and rhenium (PS-Re1, ref. 188) have been reported. PS, photosensitizer; Ph, phenyl.

Light-mediated metal-based antibacterials are not limited to PDT mechanisms. In other studies, light has been used to trigger the release of ligands from metal complexes241,242,243,244. In this case, the free ligand acts as the antimicrobial agent and/or the unsaturated metal complex interacts and binds with cellular biomolecules, such as proteins and DNA. A notable class of light-activated ligand-releasing compounds is carbon monoxide releasing molecules (CORMs)245, which are effective at killing bacteria upon CO release. Both metal-based176,184,246,247,248,249,250,251 and organic252,253 antimicrobial CORMs have been reported. For example, tricarbonylchloro(glycinato)ruthenium(II) (CORM-3) inhibited the in vitro growth of P. aeruginosa at concentrations as low as 0.5 µM, displayed no cytotoxicity at 200 µM and increased the survival of mice to 100% in a P. aeruginosa peritonitis model 72 h after infection at 7.5 mg kg−1 (ref. 249). Additional studies examined the effects of closely related CORM-2 on P. aeruginosa biofilm disruption251 and of CORM-2 and CORM-3 on killing the gut pathogen H. pylori250. In the latter case, these molecules were found to directly kill H. pylori via inhibition of respiration and urease activity, but also acted as potentiators in combination with other antibiotics250.

Overall, the field of light-activated metal-based antimicrobials remains largely uncharted. Because the optical and biological properties of metal complexes can be fine-tuned through careful ligand design, this field has an exciting future.

In addition to developing better antimicrobial therapies, there is also an urgent need to improve diagnosis to more rapidly select and monitor optimal treatment, which would reduce the unnecessary use of ineffective antibiotics and improve therapeutic outcomes. In many cases, infections are suspected to be present, but their location cannot be determined, which makes it challenging to prescribe the best therapy. There are currently no whole-body imaging techniques in clinical use that are capable of specifically identifying bacterial infections; the barriers to the development of such techniques are reviewed elsewhere254,255. Few bacterial-specific tracers have been tested in humans, with a 2019 review identifying 77 studies on preclinical and clinical imaging of bacterial infections with fluorescent tracers and radiopharmaceuticals256.

Imaging of bacterial infection has mainly been attempted using positron-emission tomography (PET) or single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging, and many of the radioisotopes used in these techniques are metals. For example, infection imaging has been attempted with white blood cells and antibodies labelled with [67Ga], [99mTc] or [111In], with variable success in detecting prosthetic joint infections257,258,259. A [99mTc]-labelled version of ciprofloxacin was clinically approved for SPECT imaging but was later removed from the market because of a lack of differentiation between sterile inflammation and infection260, which is a common failure of infection imaging agents. The same antibiotic was also converted into a PET probe as [18F]-ciprofloxacin, which was also unsuccessful in humans, indicating that the antibiotic component, not the added [99mTc], was the likely cause of failure261. Other reported probes tested in humans include a [99mTc]-labelled cationic antimicrobial peptide (ubiquicidin, UB129-41)262, which has not advanced since the early 2000s (ref. 260), and a [68Ga]-NOTA-UBI peptide complex262.

There are, however, several encouraging preclinical research directions. Some earlier examples of metal-containing bacterial targeting moieties for imaging probes include a non-specifically labelled [99mTc]-vancomycin, which showed good discrimination between S. aureus infection and turpentine inflammation in rats263; a zinc-dipicolylamine complexed labelled with [111In] (refs. 264,265) and a range of bacteriophages that were conjugated with chelators and labelled with [99mTc] (ref. 259). More recently, the bacterial uptake of iron metallophores was combined with radioisotopes [67Ga] (SPECT) or [68Ga] (PET), relying on the similarity of coordination properties between Ga3+ and Fe3+ (ref. 266). In this study, natural metallophores from fungi (that is, triacetylfusarinine and ferrioxamine E) were converted into [68Ga]-triacetylfusarinine and [68Ga]-ferrioxamine E (Fig. 8A) and compared for imaging lung infections in Aspergillus fumigatus and S. aureus rat models: only the fungal infection was readily seen owing to the selective metallophore uptake. Similarly, the metallophore pyoverdine PAO1, which is produced by P. aeruginosa, was labelled with [68Ga] and showed very selective in vitro uptake by P. aeruginosa, allowing the detection of P. aeruginosa (but not E. coli or sterile inflammation) in intratracheal (rat) and thigh (mouse) infection models267 (Fig. 8B). In contrast, [68Ga]-citrate and [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose showed non-specific uptake in both the infection and sterile inflammation sites. In another example, desferrioxamine-B — a hydroxamate metallophore produced by Streptomyces pilosus — was also labelled with [68Ga] and showed more general uptake across P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and Streptococcus agalactiae than the PAO1 metallophore, but still not by E. coli, Candida albicans or K. pneumoniae268. This allowed P. aeruginosa and S. aureus thigh and P. aeruginosa lung infections to be visualized in mice (Fig. 8C).

A, Structures of imaging agents. B, The structure of [68Ga]-PVD-PAO1 (Ba) and static PET–CT imaging of [68Ga]-PVD-PAO1 (Bb and Bc) compared with [68Ga]-citrate (Bd) and [18F]-FDG (Be) in a mouse muscle-infection model 45 min post-injection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in one thigh and Escherichia coli or sterile inflammation in the other thigh. C, The structure of [68Ga]-DFO-B (Ca) and static PET–CT imaging of [68Ga]-DFO-B in a mouse thigh-infection model 45 min post-injection with P. aeruginosa (Cb) or Staphylococcus aureus (Cc) (yellow arrows indicate site of infection). PET, positron-emission tomography; CT, computed tomography; PAI, P. aeruginosa infection; ECI, E. coli infection; SI, sterile inflammation; TAFC, triacetylfusarinine; FOXE, ferrioxamine E; PVD, pyoverdine; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; DFO-B, desferrioxamine-B; ID g−1, injected dose per gram of tissue; kBq ml−1, kilobecquerel per millilitre. Part B reprinted from ref. 267, under a Creative Commons licence CC-BY 4.0. Part C reprinted from ref. 268, under a Creative Commons licence CC-BY 4.0.

Other examples of leveraging metallophores for imaging include cyclen-based artificial bifunctional metallophores, which combine a 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic amide binding site for the gallium radionuclide and one or more catechol units to bind iron. These were able to discern (using PET) an E. coli infection in mice from lipopolysaccharide-triggered sterile inflammation88,269. However, the simpler monofunctional complex gave superior results. The galbofloxacin therapeutic described earlier, with a gallium-containing metallophore–ciprofloxacin conjugate, was converted into a radiolabelled probe by complexing [67Ga]90,91 (Fig. 8). The [67Ga]-galbofloxacin was used to determine bacterial uptake and to monitor biodistribution in mice, although imaging studies were not conducted. The complex showed superior discrimination to [67Ga]-citrate, which has been used clinically. However, it is not clear whether the additional complexity of adding additional components to the metallophore provides any advantages over just using the radiolabelled metallophore itself.

In summary, metal complexes show promise not only for treating bacterial infections but also in identifying them. Development as imaging agents may be a more rapid route to clinical use than therapeutic development, given the differing regulatory requirements for approval, and the trace quantities of the metal complex that are administered.

Over the past decade, there has been a surge of interest in identifying alternative ways to combat bacterial infections and to address the AMR health crisis. Many of the more-promising approaches involve metals as antimicrobial agents, either as free ions, in the form of nanoparticles or as metal complexes.

For free ions to exert their antibacterial effect, they need to reach the locus of the infection. In topical or local applications, this can be achieved by various delivery mechanisms, ranging from ion-loaded wound bandages to engineered gels that slowly release metal ions. For non-topical applications, the ion needs to be ‘packaged’ to be able to selectively reach the pathogenic bacteria. Here, the most promising approach is the use of metallophores, which hijack the bacterial transport systems to ensure intracellular delivery. A future direction could be the development of metallophores that strongly bind antibacterial metal ions but can release the ion when exposed to certain triggers, for example, light, pH or metabolites. Similar observations are valid for metal nanoparticles, which may find an easier road to application on topical, surface treatments or, for example, water disinfection. For systemic administration, more targeted systems will have to be developed.

In this regard, metal complexes with antibacterial properties are the most likely candidates to be advanced towards a clinically approved antibiotic. The vast structural diversity of metalloantibiotics and their alternative or multimodal mechanisms of action makes them excellent candidates to outsmart bacterial defence and resistance mechanisms.

Although we have only just scratched the surface when it comes to exploring metal complexes for their antibacterial properties, there have already been some encouraging discoveries. For example, the series of dinuclear ruthenium compounds developed by Smitten et al. is currently in preclinical development as part of the spin-off company Metallobio. However, much of the chemical space is still uncharted for metalloantibiotics. For the field to mature, this needs to be sampled systematically and comprehensively to identify additional classes of metal complexes. New metalloantibiotics need to be well characterized and their solution behaviour understood to address whether free metal ions, the entire complex or metabolites are the active components.

Data on new antimicrobial compounds need to be shared openly270 and systematically to allow for an efficient and collaborative exploration of the chemical space of metalloantibiotics. To this end, consistent and canonical identifiers for metal-containing compounds are urgently needed, as they are currently not accurately represented in chemical databases using standard chemical notation, such as SMILES (Simplified Molecular Input Line Entry System) strings. Recent efforts in this area have yielded promising candidates (for example, TUCAN271 or SELFIES272). Once standardized structure nomenclatures for metal complexes are in place, efficient and open machine-processing tools can be developed for databases and machine-learning tasks273.

Future studies need to go beyond the determination of in vitro antimicrobial MIC values, which is where most current reports end. More detailed studies into the mechanisms of action of different metal complexes, metal ions and nanoparticles are imperative. Understanding how metals and metalloantibiotics elicit their biological effect will allow for better and more-rational design of future generations and help establish these compounds as compelling drug candidates. In-depth mechanism-of-action studies for these compounds, particularly metalloantibiotics, are both time-intensive and expensive. It is therefore not surprising that their number is vanishingly small. The examples highlighted in this Review showcase how much we can learn about these compounds when we take a closer look, and how difficult it is to tease out potential multiple mechanisms of action. The studies also demonstrate the different techniques that can be used to elucidate the mechanism of action of metal complexes, such as metal-specific mass spectrometry and atomic absorption spectroscopy. The mechanism (mechanisms) of action is (are) likely to vary greatly between different metal complexes, depending not only on the type of metal but also on the ligands and coordination sphere.

The in vivo stability and ADMET (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity) properties of metal complexes need to be assessed to address concerns of metal accumulation and/or toxicity in patients, as well as in animals and the environment. Although this necessity seems self-evident, there is still a general lack of such studies in the literature, and such information is crucial for metal-based compounds to progress to human clinical trials. Several economical and ethically justifiable models for initial in vivo evaluation of drug candidates (for example, G. mellonella and zebrafish embryos) are available, but ‘gold standard’ systemic efficacy testing in mice (for example, a neutropenic thigh-infection model) is essential for validation and advancement of promising candidates. Metalloantibiotics are slowly progressing to these more challenging models. For example, intravenous dosing of a polypyridyl iridium(III) complex demonstrated comparable efficacy to fluconazole in a systemic C. albicans mouse model274. The fact that dozens of metal complexes are currently in clinical trials for other indications is encouraging; however, it remains to be proven that metalloantibiotics can save and protect humans and animals from deadly bacterial infections.

Future research in metalloantibiotics is likely to include a greater focus on those with specifically designed mechanisms. One example is catalytic metallodrugs, which are a relatively new concept and are generally studied for cancer treatment275,276. Recent studies by Ang and co-workers277 showcased the potential of catalytic metal complexes as antimicrobial agents. They developed tailored ruthenium complexes to specifically activate an azide-bearing antibiotic prodrug inside bacteria in a catalytic reaction that involves endogenous formate. In other work, similar ruthenium complexes were optimized as catalysts for transfer hydrogenation and/or singlet oxygen generation in bacteria, leading to antibacterial activity in Gram-positive strains.

Lastly, it is clear that the AMR crisis will not be solved by developing new antibiotics alone. As highlighted by many leaders in the field2,278, complex issues concerning antibiotics, such as their overuse and misuse by patients and doctors, their rampant use in agriculture and their low return on investment for drug companies (several biotech companies that have succeeded in bringing an antibiotic to market have gone bankrupt afterwards owing to poor sales)279,280, need to be addressed for us to overcome this global health challenge. As with any new antibiotic, should a metal ion, nanoparticle formulation or a metalloantibiotic successfully advance into clinical use, careful stewardship is essential to maintain effectiveness against drug-resistant pathogens for as long as possible.

Overall, there is an exciting future for metal-based complexes as drugs and, more specifically, as antibiotics. However, without a focused effort by the community addressing the challenges outlined earlier, the field cannot progress. If the current and coming generation of researchers can rise to the challenge, we are likely heading into a future where metal-based drugs and therapies are as common and reliable as their historical organic counterparts.

Murray, C. J. L. et al. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 399, 629–655 (2022). Seminal paper reporting the burden of antimicrobial resistance and estimating the number of global deaths directly attributed, or related, to resistant infections.

Article CAS Google Scholar

O’Neill, J. Tackling drug-resistant infections globally: final report and recommendations. (Government of the United Kingdom, 2016). Landmark report that analysed the impact of antimicrobial resistance from an economic perspective, which is the source of the highly quoted figure that antimicrobial resistance will cause 10 million deaths per year by 2050.

Cong, W. et al. Antimicrobial use in COVID-19 patients in the first phase of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a scoping review. Antibiotics 10, 745 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Butler, M. S. et al. Analysis of the clinical pipeline of treatments for drug-resistant bacterial infections: despite progress, more action is needed. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 66, e0199121 (2022). Survey of antibiotics in the clinical pipeline, highlighting how new scaffolds with novel mechanisms of action are needed.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Anthony, E. J. et al. Metallodrugs are unique: opportunities and challenges of discovery and development. Chem. Sci. 11, 12888–12917 (2020). Up-to-date overview of the current status of metal complexes as drugs, highlighting clinical developments and future directions.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pandey, A. & Boros, E. Coordination complexes to combat bacterial infections: recent developments, current directions and future opportunities. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 7340–7350 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Centola, G., Xue, F. & Wilks, A. Metallotherapeutics development in the age of iron-clad bacteria. Metallomics 12, 1863–1877 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Nasiri Sovari, S. & Zobi, F. Recent studies on the antimicrobial activity of transition metal complexes of groups 6–12. Chemistry 2, 418–452 (2020).

Article Google Scholar

Frei, A. Metal complexes, an untapped source of antibiotic potential? Antibiotics 9, 90 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sierra, M. A., Casarrubios, L. & de la Torre, M. C. Bio-organometallic derivatives of antibacterial drugs. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 7232–7242 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Patra, M., Gasser, G. & Metzler-Nolte, N. Small organometallic compounds as antibacterial agents. Dalton Trans. 41, 6350–6358 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Liang, J. et al. Discovery of metal-based complexes as promising antimicrobial agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 224, 113696 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Evans, A. & Kavanagh, K. A. Evaluation of metal-based antimicrobial compounds for the treatment of bacterial pathogens. J. Med. Microbiol. 70, 001363 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Schindler, K. & Zobi, F. Anticancer and antibiotic rhenium tri- and dicarbonyl complexes: current research and future perspectives. Molecules 27, 539 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Claudel, M., Schwarte, J. V. & Fromm, K. M. New antimicrobial strategies based on metal complexes. Chemistry 2, 849–899 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Biegański, P., Szczupak, Ł., Arruebo, M. & Kowalski, K. D. Brief survey on organometalated antibacterial drugs and metal-based materials with antibacterial activity. RSC Chem. Biol. 2, 368–386 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Regiel-Futyra, A. et al. Bioinorganic antimicrobial strategies in the resistance era. Coord. Chem. Rev. 351, 76–117 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lemire, J. A., Harrison, J. J. & Turner, R. J. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 11, 371–384 (2013). One of the first systematic comprehensive examinations of the molecular and cellular targets of metal ions in bacteria.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sánchez-López, E. et al. Metal-based nanoparticles as antimicrobial agents: an overview. Nanomaterials 10, 292 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ndayishimiye, J., Kumeria, T., Popat, A., Falconer, J. R. & Blaskovich, M. A. T. Nanomaterials: the new antimicrobial magic bullet. ACS Infect. Dis. 8, 693–712 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lin, Y., Betts, H., Keller, S., Cariou, K. & Gasser, G. Recent developments of metal-based compounds against fungal pathogens. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 10346–10402 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Chandrangsu, P., Rensing, C. & Helmann, J. D. Metal homeostasis and resistance in bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 15, 338–350 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Palmer, L. D. & Skaar, E. P. Transition metals and virulence in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Genet. 50, 67–91 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Rodionov, D. A., Hebbeln, P., Gelfand, M. S. & Eitinger, T. Comparative and functional genomic analysis of prokaryotic nickel and cobalt uptake transporters: evidence for a novel group of ATP-binding cassette transporters. J. Bacteriol. 188, 317–327 (2006).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cheng, J., Poduska, B., Morton, R. A. & Finan, T. M. An ABC-type cobalt transport system is essential for growth of Sinorhizobium melilotiat trace metal concentrations. J. Bacteriol. 193, 4405–4416 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Stewart, L. J. et al. Handling of nutrient copper in the bacterial envelope. Metallomics 11, 50–63 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zhong, Q., Kobe, B. & Kappler, U. Molybdenum enzymes and how they support virulence in pathogenic bacteria. Front. Microbiol. 11, 615860 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kehl-Fie, T. E. & Skaar, E. P. Nutritional immunity beyond iron: a role for manganese and zinc. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 14, 218–224 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Djoko, K. Y., Ong, C.-l. Y., Walker, M. J. & McEwan, A. G. The role of copper and zinc toxicity in innate immune defense against bacterial pathogens. J. Biol. Chem. 290, 18954–18961 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

von Pein, J. B., Stocks, C. J., Schembri, M. A., Kapetanovic, R. & Sweet, M. J. An alloy of zinc and innate immunity: galvanising host defence against infection. Cell. Microbiol. 23, e13268 (2021).

Google Scholar

Hood, M. I. & Skaar, E. P. Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen–host interface. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10, 525–537 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Flo, T. H. et al. Lipocalin 2 mediates an innate immune response to bacterial infection by sequestrating iron. Nature 432, 917–921 (2004).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Corbin, B. D. et al. Metal chelation and inhibition of bacterial growth in tissue abscesses. Science 319, 962–965 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Planeta Kepp, K. Bioinorganic chemistry of zinc in relation to the immune system. ChemBioChem 23, e202100554 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Subramanian Vignesh, K., Landero Figueroa, J. A., Porollo, A., Caruso, J. A. & Deepe, G. S. Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor induced Zn sequestration enhances macrophage superoxide and limits intracellular pathogen survival. Immunity 39, 697–710 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Stocks, C. J. et al. Frontline science: LPS-inducible SLC30A1 drives human macrophage-mediated zinc toxicity against intracellular Escherichia coli. J. Leukoc. Biol. 109, 287–297 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Stocks, C. J., Schembri, M. A., Sweet, M. J. & Kapetanovic, R. For when bacterial infections persist: toll-like receptor-inducible direct antimicrobial pathways in macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 103, 35–51 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pederick, V. G. et al. ZnuA and zinc homeostasis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 5, 13139 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Stocks, C. J. et al. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli employs both evasion and resistance to subvert innate immune-mediated zinc toxicity for dissemination. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 6341–6350 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ong, C.-L., Gillen, C. M., Barnett, T. C., Walker, M. J. & McEwan, A. G. An antimicrobial role for zinc in innate immune defense against group A streptococcus. J. Infect. Dis. 209, 1500–1508 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Janiszewski, L. N., Minson, M., Allen, M. A., Dowell, R. D. & Palmer, A. E. Characterization of global gene expression, regulation of metal ions, and infection outcomes in immune-competent 129S6 mouse macrophages. Infect. Immun. 89, e0027321 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Eijkelkamp, B. A. et al. Extracellular zinc competitively inhibits manganese uptake and compromises oxidative stress management in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PLoS ONE 9, e89427 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Couñago, R. M. et al. Imperfect coordination chemistry facilitates metal ion release in the Psa permease. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 35–41 (2014).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Bahr, G., González, L. J. & Vila, A. J. Metallo-β-lactamases and a tug-of-war for the available zinc at the host–pathogen interface. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 66, 102103 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Andrews, S. C., Robinson, A. K. & Rodríguez-Quiñones, F. Bacterial iron homeostasis. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27, 215–237 (2003).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Puig, S., Ramos-Alonso, L., Romero, A. M. & Martínez-Pastor, M. T. The elemental role of iron in DNA synthesis and repair. Metallomics 9, 1483–1500 (2017).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Drakesmith, H. & Prentice, A. Viral infection and iron metabolism. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6, 541–552 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Raymond Kenneth, N., Dertz Emily, A. & Kim Sanggoo, S. Enterobactin: an archetype for microbial iron transport. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 100, 3584–3588 (2003).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Stintzi, A., Barnes, C., Xu, J. & Raymond Kenneth, N. Microbial iron transport via a siderophore shuttle: a membrane ion transport paradigm. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 97, 10691–10696 (2000).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Hider, R. C. & Kong, X. Chemistry and biology of siderophores. Nat. Prod. Rep. 27, 637–657 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lyman, L. R., Schaeffer, J., Ruppitsch, W. & Schmitt, M. P. Analysis of the HbpA protein from Corynebacterium diphtheriae clinical isolates and identification of a putative hemoglobin-binding site on HbpA. J. Bacteriol. 204, e0034922 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Kramer, J., Özkaya, Ö. & Kümmerli, R. Bacterial siderophores in community and host interactions. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 18, 152–163 (2020). Highlights the importance of bacterial siderophores for iron transport and their role in bacterium–host interactions.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Khan, A., Singh, P. & Srivastava, A. Synthesis, nature and utility of universal iron chelator — siderophore: a review. Microbiol. Res. 212–213, 103–111 (2018).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Holbein, B. E., Ang, M. T. C., Allan, D. S., Chen, W. & Lehmann, C. in Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 49: Mitigation of Antimicrobial Resistance, Vol 2. Natural and Synthetic Approaches (eds Panwar, H. et al.) 251–311 (Springer International Publishing, 2021).

Diarra, M. S. et al. Species selectivity of new siderophore–drug conjugates that use specific iron uptake for entry into bacteria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 40, 2610–2617 (1996).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Boukhalfa, H. & Crumbliss, A. L. Chemical aspects of siderophore mediated iron transport. BioMetals 15, 325–339 (2002).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Spasojević, I., Boukhalfa, H., Stevens, R. D. & Crumbliss, A. L. Aqueous solution speciation of Fe(III) complexes with dihydroxamate siderophores alcaligin and rhodotorulic acid and synthetic analogues using electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Inorg. Chem. 40, 49–58 (2001).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Albrecht-Gary, A. M. & Crumbliss, A. L. Coordination chemistry of siderophores: thermodynamics and kinetics of iron chelation and release. Met. Ions Biol. Syst. 35, 239–327 (1998).

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Helman, R. & Lawrence, G. D. The increase in ferrioxamine B reduction potential with increasing acidity of the medium. Bioelectrochem. Bioenerg. 22, 187–196 (1989).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Johnstone, T. C. & Nolan, E. M. Beyond iron: non-classical biological functions of bacterial siderophores. Dalton Trans. 44, 6320–6339 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chakraborty, R., Storey, E. & van der Helm, D. Molecular mechanism of ferricsiderophore passage through the outer membrane receptor proteins of Escherichia coli. BioMetals 20, 263–274 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

May Kerrie, L. & Grabowicz, M. The bacterial outer membrane is an evolving antibiotic barrier. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 8852–8854 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Noinaj, N., Guillier, M., Barnard, T. J. & Buchanan, S. K. TonB-dependent transporters: regulation, structure, and function. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 64, 43–60 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Moeck, G. S. & Coulton, J. W. TonB-dependent iron acquisition: mechanisms of siderophore-mediated active transport. Mol. Microbiol. 28, 675–681 (1998).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Reynolds, D. M., Schatz, A. & Waksman, S. A. Grisein, a new antibiotic produced by a strain of Streptomyces griseus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 64, 50–54 (1947).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Vértesy, L., Aretz, W., Fehlhaber, H.-W. & Kogler, H. Salmycin A–D, Antibiotika aus Streptomyces violaceus, DSM 8286, mit Siderophor-Aminoglycosid-Struktur. Helv. Chim. Acta 78, 46–60 (1995).

Article Google Scholar

Schalk, I. J., Mislin, G. L. & Brillet, K. Structure, function and binding selectivity and stereoselectivity of siderophore-iron outer membrane transporters. Curr. Top. Membr. 69, 37–66 (2012).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Boyce, J. H. et al. Platform to discover protease-activated antibiotics and application to siderophore–antibiotic conjugates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 21310–21321 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

McCreary, E. K., Heil, E. L. & Tamma, P. D. New perspectives on antimicrobial agents: cefiderocol. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 65, e0217120 (2021).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Isler, B., Doi, Y., Bonomo, R. A. & Paterson, D. L. New treatment options against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63, e01110–e01118 (2018).

PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tenero, D. et al. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability evaluation of single and multiple doses of GSK3342830 in healthy volunteers. Clin. Pharmacol. Drug Dev. 8, 754–764 (2019).

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Page, M. G. P., Dantier, C. & Desarbre, E. In vitro properties of BAL30072, a novel siderophore sulfactam with activity against multiresistant gram-negative bacilli. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 2291–2302 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Paech, F. et al. Mechanisms of hepatotoxicity associated with the monocyclic β-lactam antibiotic BAL30072. Arch. Toxicol. 91, 3647–3662 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Flanagan, M. E. et al. Preparation, gram-negative antibacterial activity, and hydrolytic stability of novel siderophore-conjugated monocarbam diols. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2, 385–390 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Han, S. et al. Structural basis for effectiveness of siderophore-conjugated monocarbams against clinically relevant strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 22002–22007 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

McPherson, C. J. et al. Clinically relevant Gram-negative resistance mechanisms have no effect on the efficacy of MC-1, a novel siderophore-conjugated monocarbam. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 56, 6334–6342 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tomaras, A. P. et al. Adaptation-based resistance to siderophore-conjugated antibacterial agents by Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 57, 4197–4207 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Kong, H. et al. An overview of recent progress in siderophore–antibiotic conjugates. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 182, 111615 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Negash, K. H., Norris, J. K. S. & Hodgkinson, J. T. Siderophore–antibiotic conjugate design: new drugs for bad bugs? Molecules 24, 3314 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Tonziello, G., Caraffa, E., Pinchera, B., Granata, G. & Petrosillo, N. Present and future of siderophore-based therapeutic and diagnostic approaches in infectious diseases. Infect. Dis. Rep. 11, 8208 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Miller, M. J. & Liu, R. Design and syntheses of new antibiotics inspired by nature's quest for iron in an oxidative climate. Acc. Chem. Res. 54, 1646–1661 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wencewicz, T. A., Long, T. E., Möllmann, U. & Miller, M. J. Trihydroxamate siderophore–fluoroquinolone conjugates are selective sideromycin antibiotics that target Staphylococcus aureus. Bioconjug. Chem. 24, 473–486 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ghosh, M. et al. Targeted antibiotic delivery: selective siderophore conjugation with daptomycin confers potent activity against multidrug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii both in vitro and in vivo. J. Med. Chem. 60, 4577–4583 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Melander, R. J., Zurawski, D. V. & Melander, C. Narrow-spectrum antibacterial agents. MedChemComm 9, 12–21 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kinzel, O. & Budzikiewicz, H. Synthesis and biological evaluation of a pyoverdin-β-lactam conjugate: a new type of arginine-specific cross-linking in aqueous solution. J. Pept. Res. 53, 618–625 (1999).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Kinzel, O., Tappe, R., Gerus, I. & Budzikiewicz, H. The synthesis and antibacterial activity of two pyoverdin-ampicillin conjugates, entering Pseudomonas aeruginosa via the pyoverdin-mediated iron uptake pathway. J. Antibiot. 51, 499–507 (1998).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Neumann, W., Sassone-Corsi, M., Raffatellu, M. & Nolan, E. M. Esterase-catalyzed siderophore hydrolysis activates an enterobactin–ciprofloxacin conjugate and confers targeted antibacterial activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140, 5193–5201 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ferreira, K. et al. Multivalent siderophore–DOTAM conjugates as theranostics for imaging and treatment of bacterial infections. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 56, 8272–8276 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Pinkert, L. et al. Antibiotic conjugates with an artificial MECAM-based siderophore are potent agents against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial pathogens. J. Med. Chem. 64, 15440–15460 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pandey, A., Śmiłowicz, D. & Boros, E. Galbofloxacin: a xenometal-antibiotic with potent in vitro and in vivo efficacy against S. aureus. Chem. Sci. 12, 14546–14556 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pandey, A. et al. Theranostic gallium siderophore ciprofloxacin conjugate with broad spectrum antibiotic potency. J. Med. Chem. 62, 9947–9960 (2019). An insightful study that demonstrates two alternative uses for siderophore–antibiotic conjugates using the same construct for diagnosis and therapy.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Nguyen, M., Vendier, L., Stigliani, J.-L., Meunier, B. & Robert, A. Structures of the copper and zinc complexes of PBT2, a chelating agent evaluated as potential drug for neurodegenerative diseases. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 600–608 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Angu, D. et al. Safety, tolerability, and efficacy of PBT2 in Huntington's disease: a phase 2, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 14, 39–47 (2015).

Article Google Scholar

Bohlmann, L. et al. Chemical synergy between ionophore PBT2 and zinc reverses antibiotic resistance. mBio 9, e02391–02318 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Jen, F. E. C. et al. Neisseria gonorrhoeae becomes susceptible to polymyxin B and colistin in the presence of PBT2. ACS Infect. Dis. 6, 50–55 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

De Oliveira, D. M. P. et al. Repurposing a neurodegenerative disease drug to treat Gram-negative antibiotic-resistant bacterial sepsis. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eabb3791 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Oliveri, V. Biomedical applications of copper ionophores. Coord. Chem. Rev. 422, 213474 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jackson, A. C. et al. Benzimidazole and benzoxazole zinc chelators as inhibitors of metallo-β-lactamase NDM-1. ChemMedChem 16, 654–661 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jackson, A. C., Zaengle-Barone, J. M., Puccio, E. A. & Franz, K. J. A cephalosporin prochelator inhibits new delhi metallo-β-lactamase 1 without removing zinc. ACS Infect. Dis. 6, 1264–1272 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Zaengle-Barone, J. M. et al. Copper influences the antibacterial outcomes of a β-lactamase-activated prochelator against drug-resistant bacteria. ACS Infect. Dis. 4, 1019–1029 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Yarlagadda, V., Sarkar, P., Samaddar, S. & Haldar, J. A vancomycin derivative with a pyrophosphate-binding group: a strategy to combat vancomycin-resistant bacteria. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 55, 7836–7840 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Chen, J., Li, J., Zhang, H., Shi, W. & Liu, Y. Bacterial heavy-metal and antibiotic resistance genes in a copper tailing dam area in Northern China. Front. Microbiol. 10, 1916 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bruins, M. R., Kapil, S. & Oehme, F. W. Microbial resistance to metals in the environment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 45, 198–207 (2000).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Aljerf, L. & AlMasri, N. A gateway to metal resistance: bacterial response to heavy metal toxicity in the biological environment. Annu. Adv. Chem. 2, 32–44 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

González Henao, S. & Ghneim-Herrera, T. Heavy metals in soils and the remediation potential of bacteria associated with the plant microbiome. Front. Environ. Sci. 9, 604216 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Abram, S.-L. & Fromm, K. M. Handling (nano)silver as antimicrobial agent: therapeutic window, dissolution dynamics, detection methods and molecular interactions. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 10948–10971 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ciriminna, R., Albo, Y. & Pagliaro, M. New antivirals and antibacterials based on silver nanoparticles. ChemMedChem 15, 1619–1623 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sim, W., Barnard, R. T., Blaskovich, M. A. T. & Ziora, Z. M. Antimicrobial silver in medicinal and consumer applications: a patent review of the past decade (2007–2017). Antibiotics 7, 93 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Eckhardt, S. et al. Nanobio silver: its interactions with peptides and bacteria, and its uses in medicine. Chem. Rev. 113, 4708–4754 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Atiyeh, B. S., Costagliola, M., Hayek, S. N. & Dibo, S. A. Effect of silver on burn wound infection control and healing: review of the literature. Burns 33, 139–148 (2007).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Moyer, C. A., Brentano, L., Gravens, D. L., Margraf, H. W. & Monafo, W. W. J. Treatment of large human burns with 0.5% silver nitrate solution. Arch. Surg. 90, 812–867 (1965).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Stanford, W., Rappole, B. W. & Fox, C. L. Jr Clinical experience with silver sulfadiazine, a new topical agent for control of pseudomonas infections in burns. J. Trauma 9, 377–388 (1969).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Xiu, Z.-M., Zhang, Q.-B, Puppala, H. L., Colvin, V. L. & Alvarez, P. J. J. Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 12, 4271–4275 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Surwade, P. et al. Augmented antibacterial activity of ampicillin with silver nanoparticles against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). J. Antibiot. 72, 50–53 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Morones-Ramirez, J. R., Winkler, J. A., Spina, C. S. & Collins, J. J. Silver enhances antibiotic activity against Gram-negative bacteria. Sci. Transl. Med. 5, 190ra181 (2013).

Article Google Scholar

Habash, M. B. et al. Potentiation of tobramycin by silver nanoparticles against Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61, e00415–e00417 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Panáček, A. et al. Silver nanoparticles strongly enhance and restore bactericidal activity of inactive antibiotics against multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerf. 142, 392–399 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Khansa, I., Schoenbrunner, A. R., Kraft, C. T. & Janis, J. E. Silver in wound care — friend or foe?: a comprehensive review. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 7, e2390 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Pormohammad, A., Monych, N. K., Ghosh, S., Turner, D. L. & Turner, R. J. Nanomaterials in wound healing and infection control. Antibiotics 10, 473 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Colloidal Silver. National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health https://www.nccih.nih.gov/health/colloidal-silver (updated April 2017).

Colloidal Silver: Risk Without Benefit. Quackwatch https://quackwatch.org/related/PhonyAds/silverad/ (2021).

Pulit-Prociak, J. & Banach, M. Silver nanoparticles – a material of the future…? Open Chem. J. 14, 76–91 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Ferdous, Z. & Nemmar, A. Health impact of silver nanoparticles: a review of the biodistribution and toxicity following various routes of exposure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 2375 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Silver, S. Bacterial silver resistance: molecular biology and uses and misuses of silver compounds. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27, 341–353 (2003).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wang, H. et al. Characterization of silver resistance and coexistence of sil operon with antibiotic resistance genes among Gram-negative pathogens isolated from wound samples by using whole-genome sequencing. Infect. Drug Resist. 15, 1425–1437 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Elkrewi, E., Randall, C. P., Ooi, N., Cottell, J. L. & O’Neill, A. J. Cryptic silver resistance is prevalent and readily activated in certain Gram-negative pathogens. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 72, 3043–3046 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Muller, M. & Merrett, N. D. Pyocyanin production by Pseudomonas aeruginosa confers resistance to ionic silver. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 5492–5499 (2014).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wu, K. et al. Mutagenesis and resistance development of bacteria challenged by silver nanoparticles. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 66, e0062822 (2022).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Durán, N. et al. Silver nanoparticles: a new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 12, 789–799 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Kohanski, M. A., Dwyer, D. J., Hayete, B., Lawrence, C. A. & Collins, J. J. A common mechanism of cellular death induced by bactericidal antibiotics. Cell 130, 797–810 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Foti, J. J., Devadoss, B., Winkler, J. A., Collins, J. J. & Walker, G. C. Oxidation of the guanine nucleotide pool underlies cell death by bactericidal antibiotics. Science 336, 315–319 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Liu, Y. & Imlay, J. A. Cell death from antibiotics without the involvement of reactive oxygen species. Science 339, 1210–1213 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Keren, I., Wu, Y., Inocencio, J., Mulcahy, L. R. & Lewis, K. Killing by bactericidal antibiotics does not depend on reactive oxygen species. Science 339, 1213–1216 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Rasouly, A. & Nudler, E. The very hungry bactericidal antibiotics. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 119, e2208035119 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Anuj, S. A., Gajera, H. P., Hirpara, D. G. & Golakiya, B. A. Interruption in membrane permeability of drug-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with cationic particles of nano-silver. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 127, 208–216 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wang, H. et al. Deciphering molecular mechanism of silver by integrated omic approaches enables enhancing its antimicrobial efficacy in E. coli. PLoS Biol. 17, e3000292 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, H. et al. Antimicrobial silver targets glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in glycolysis of E. coli. Chem. Sci. 10, 7193–7199 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, H. et al. Multi-target mode of action of silver against Staphylococcus aureus endows it with capability to combat antibiotic resistance. Nat. Commun. 12, 3331 (2021). Groundbreaking detailed mechanism-of-action study of antibacterial silver.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, H. et al. Atomic differentiation of silver binding preference in protein targets: Escherichia coli malate dehydrogenase as a paradigm. Chem. Sci. 11, 11714–11719 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mazzei, L., Cianci, M., Gonzalez Vara, A. & Ciurli, S. The structure of urease inactivated by Ag(I): a new paradigm for enzyme inhibition by heavy metals. Dalton Trans. 47, 8240–8247 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gugala, N. et al. Using a chemical genetic screen to enhance our understanding of the antibacterial properties of silver. Genes 9, 344 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dollwet, H. H. A. & Sorenson, J. R. J. Historic uses of copper compounds in medicine. Trace Elem. Med. 2, 80–87 (1985).

Google Scholar

Grass, G., Rensing, C. & Solioz, M. Metallic copper as an antimicrobial surface. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 1541–1547 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Arendsen, L. P., Thakar, R. & Sultan, A. H. The use of copper as an antimicrobial agent in health care, including obstetrics and gynecology. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 32, e00125–18 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Shams, S. et al. Antifungal effect of gatifloxacin and copper ions combination. J. Antibiot. 67, 499–504 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Manning, T. et al. The copper (II) ion as a carrier for the antibiotic capreomycin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 24, 976–982 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dalecki, A. G. et al. Disulfiram and copper ions kill Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a synergistic manner. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 59, 4835–4844 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wiebelhaus, N., Zaengle-Barone, J. M., Hwang, K. K., Franz, K. J. & Fitzgerald, M. C. Protein folding stability changes across the proteome reveal targets of Cu toxicity in E. coli. ACS Chem. Biol. 16, 214–224 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gugala, N., Salazar-Alemán, D. A., Chua, G. & Turner, R. J. Using a chemical genetic screen to enhance our understanding of the antimicrobial properties of copper. Metallomics 14, mfab071 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Kaur, I. et al. Role of horizontally transferred copper resistance genes in Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes. Microbiology 168, 001162 (2022).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Riduan, S. N. & Zhang, Y. Recent advances of zinc-based antimicrobial materials. Chem. Asian J. 16, 2588–2595 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gudkov, S. V. et al. A mini review of antibacterial properties of ZnO nanoparticles. Front. Phys. 9, 641481 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Pasquet, J. et al. The contribution of zinc ions to the antimicrobial activity of zinc oxide. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 457, 263–274 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Shareena Dasari, T. P., Deng, H. & Yu, H. Antimicrobial activity of gold nanoparticles and ionic gold. J. Environ. Sci. Health C. 33, 286–327 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Tao, C. Antimicrobial activity and toxicity of gold nanoparticles: research progress, challenges and prospects. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 67, 537–543 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Rajendran, S., Prabha, S. S., Rathish, R. J., Singh, G. & Al-Hashem, A. in Nanotoxicity (eds Rajendran, S., Mukherjee, A., Nguyen, T. A., Godugu, C., & Shukla, R. K.) 275–281 (Elsevier, 2020).

Ayaz Ahmed, K. B., Raman, T. & Anbazhagan, V. Platinum nanoparticles inhibit bacteria proliferation and rescue zebrafish from bacterial infection. RSC Adv. 6, 44415–44424 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Bresee, J., Maier, K. E., Melander, C. & Feldheim, D. L. Identification of antibiotics using small molecule variable ligand display on gold nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 46, 7516–7518 (2010).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Briand, G. G. & Burford, N. Bismuth compounds and preparations with biological or medicinal relevance. Chem. Rev. 99, 2601–2658 (1999).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Svensson Grape, E., Rooth, V., Nero, M., Willhammar, T. & Inge, A. K. Structure of the active pharmaceutical ingredient bismuth subsalicylate. Nat. Commun. 13, 1984 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wang, R. et al. Bismuth antimicrobial drugs serve as broad-spectrum metallo-β-lactamase inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 9, 439 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Bonchi, C., Imperi, F., Minandri, F., Visca, P. & Frangipani, E. Repurposing of gallium-based drugs for antibacterial therapy. BioFactors 40, 303–312 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, F., Liu, F., Huang, K. & Yang, S. Advancement of gallium and gallium-based compounds as antimicrobial agents. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10, 827960 (2022).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Levaditi, C., Bardet, J., Tchakirian, A. & Vaisman, A. Therapeutic properties of gallium in syphilis and trypanosomiasis. Comptes Rendus Acad. Bulg. Sci. 192, 1142–1143 (1931).

CAS Google Scholar

Gugala, N., Chatfield-Reed, K., Turner, R. J. & Chua, G. Using a chemical genetic screen to enhance our understanding of the antimicrobial properties of gallium against Escherichia coli. Genes 10, 34 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, H.-R. et al. Cage-like Ta@Bqn complexes (n = 23–28, q = −1– + 3) in 18-electron configurations with the highest coordination number of twenty-eight. Nanoscale 10, 7451–7456 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Morrison, C. N. et al. Expanding medicinal chemistry into 3D space: metallofragments as 3D scaffolds for fragment-based drug discovery. Chem. Sci. 11, 1216–1225 (2020). Seminal study that systematically demonstrates the often mentioned but seldomly proven superior three-dimensional geometry of metal complexes.

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lovering, F., Bikker, J. & Humblet, C. Escape from flatland: increasing saturation as an approach to improving clinical success. J. Med. Chem. 52, 6752–6756 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Lovering, F. Escape from flatland 2: complexity and promiscuity. MedChemComm 4, 515–519 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Boros, E., Dyson, P. J. & Gasser, G. Classification of metal-based drugs according to their mechanisms of action. Chem 6, 41–60 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dwyer, F. P., Gyarfas, E. C., Rogers, W. P. & Koch, J. H. Biological activity of complex ions. Nature 170, 190–191 (1952).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Rosenberg, B., Van Camp, L. & Krigas, T. Inhibition of cell division in Escherichia coli by electrolysis products from a platinum electrode. Nature 205, 698–699 (1965).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Smitten, K. L. et al. Mononuclear ruthenium(II) theranostic complexes that function as broad-spectrum antimicrobials in therapeutically resistant pathogens through interaction with DNA. Chem. Sci. 11, 8828–8838 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sovari, S. N. et al. Design, synthesis and in vivo evaluation of 3-arylcoumarin derivatives of rhenium(I) tricarbonyl complexes as potent antibacterial agents against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Eur. J. Med. Chem. 205, 112533 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Sovari, S. N. et al. Combatting AMR: a molecular approach to the discovery of potent and non-toxic rhenium complexes active against C. albicans-MRSA co-infection. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 226, 113858 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Güntzel, P. et al. Biological activity of manganese(I) tricarbonyl complexes on multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: from functional studies to in vivo activity in Galleria mellonella. Metallomics 11, 2033–2042 (2019).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Frei, A. et al. Metal complexes as a promising source for new antibiotics. Chem. Sci. 11, 2627–2639 (2020). Highlights the potential for metal complexes to have antimicrobial activity by analysing data obtained by the CO-ADD initiative, which has screened over 300,000 molecules for antimicrobial activity. One of the first studies to systematically demonstrate that metal compounds have a much higher ‘hit rate’ than traditional organic compounds, and without higher cytotoxicity.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Trimble, M. J., Mlynárčik, P., Kolář, M. & Hancock, R. E. W. Polymyxin: alternative mechanisms of action and resistance. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 6, a025288 (2016).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. et al. Analysis of the mechanism of action of potent antibacterial hetero-tri-organometallic compounds: a structurally new class of antibiotics. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 1442–1450 (2013). One of the first in-depth studies of the mechanism of action of an antimicrobial metal complex.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Patra, M. et al. Sequential insertion of three different organometallics into a versatile building block containing a PNA backbone. Dalton Trans. 39, 5617–5619 (2010).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Patra, M. et al. An organometallic structure–activity relationship study reveals the essential role of a Re(CO)3 moiety in the activity against Gram-positive pathogens including MRSA. Chem. Sci. 6, 214–224 (2015). Among the first structure–activity relationship studies of an antibacterial organometallic compound.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dubar, F. et al. The ferroquine antimalarial conundrum: redox activation and reinvasion inhibition. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 7690–7693 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Nagel, C. et al. Introducing [Mn(CO)3(tpa-κ3N)] + as a novel photoactivatable CO-releasing molecule with well-defined iCORM intermediates — synthesis, spectroscopy, and antibacterial activity. Dalton Trans. 43, 9986–9997 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tinajero-Trejo, M. et al. Antimicrobial activity of the manganese photoactivated carbon monoxide-releasing molecule [Mn(CO)3(tpa-κ3N)] + against a pathogenic Escherichia coli that causes urinary infections. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 24, 765–780 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Betts, J., Nagel, C., Schatzschneider, U., Poole, R. & La Ragione, R. M. Antimicrobial activity of carbon monoxide-releasing molecule [Mn(CO)3(tpa-κ3N)]Br versus multidrug-resistant isolates of Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli and its synergy with colistin. PLoS ONE 12, e0186359 (2017).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Betts, J. W. et al. Antibacterial activity of Mn(I) and Re(I) tricarbonyl complexes conjugated to a bile acid carrier molecule. Metallomics 12, 1563–1575 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Liakopoulos, A. et al. Manganese complex [Mn(CO)3(tpa-κ3N)]Br increases antibiotic sensitivity in multidrug resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist. 22, 594–597 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Frei, A., Amado, M., Cooper, M. A. & Blaskovich, M. A. T. Light-activated rhenium complexes with dual mode of action against bacteria. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 2852–2858 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Siegmund, D. et al. Benzannulated Re(I)–NHC complexes: synthesis, photophysical properties and antimicrobial activity. Dalton Trans. 46, 15269–15279 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hubick, S. et al. A potent synthetic inorganic antibiotic with activity against drug-resistant pathogens. Sci. Rep. 7, 41999 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Simpson, P. V., Nagel, C., Bruhn, H. & Schatzschneider, U. Antibacterial and antiparasitic activity of manganese(I) tricarbonyl complexes with ketoconazole, miconazole, and clotrimazole ligands. Organometallics 34, 3809–3815 (2015).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Mendes, S. S. et al. Synergetic antimicrobial activity and mechanism of clotrimazole-linked CO-releasing molecules. ACS Bio. Med. Chem. Au 2, 419–436 (2022). An extensive study into the mechanism of action of novel rhenium-based antimicrobial metal complexes.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Li, X. et al. RNA and DNA binding of inert oligonuclear ruthenium(II) complexes in live eukaryotic cells. Dalton Trans. 44, 3594–3603 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, F., Collins, J. G. & Keene, F. R. Ruthenium complexes as antimicrobial agents. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 2529–2542 (2015). This review summarizes the seminal work conducted by the groups of Collins and Keene on antibacterial polynuclear ruthenium complexes.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gorle, A. K. et al. Tri- and tetra-nuclear polypyridyl ruthenium(II) complexes as antimicrobial agents. Dalton Trans. 43, 16713–16725 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Pandrala, M. et al. Chlorido-containing ruthenium(II) and iridium(III) complexes as antimicrobial agents. Dalton Trans. 42, 4686–4694 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, F. et al. The antimicrobial activity of inert oligonuclear polypyridylruthenium(II) complexes against pathogenic bacteria, including MRSA. Dalton Trans. 40, 5032–5038 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Li, F. et al. In vitro susceptibility and cellular uptake for a new class of antimicrobial agents: dinuclear ruthenium(II) complexes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2686–2695 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Erkkila, K. E., Odom, D. T. & Barton, J. K. Recognition and reaction of metallointercalators with DNA. Chem. Rev. 99, 2777–2796 (1999).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Zeglis, B. M., Pierre, V. C. & Barton, J. K. Metallo-intercalators and metallo-insertors. Chem. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1039/B710949K (2007).

Article Google Scholar

Li, F. et al. Dinuclear ruthenium(II) antimicrobial agents that selectively target polysomes in vivo. Chem. Sci. 5, 685–693 (2014).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Weber, D. K. et al. Membrane insertion of a dinuclear polypyridylruthenium(II) complex revealed by solid-state NMR and molecular dynamics simulation: implications for selective antibacterial activity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 15267–15277 (2016).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Smitten, K. L. et al. Using nanoscopy to probe the biological activity of antimicrobial leads that display potent activity against pathogenic, multidrug resistant, gram-negative bacteria. ACS Nano 13, 5133–5146 (2019). In-depth study into a new type of dinuclear ruthenium complex with activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. This compound class is now in preclinical development as part of a start-up company (Metallbio).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gill, M. R. et al. A ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex for direct imaging of DNA structure in living cells. Nat. Chem. 1, 662–667 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Varney, A. M., Smitten, K. L., Thomas, J. A. & McLean, S. Transcriptomic analysis of the activity and mechanism of action of a ruthenium(II)-based antimicrobial that induces minimal evolution of pathogen resistance. ACS Pharmacol. Transl. Sci. 4, 168–178 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Smitten, K. L. et al. Ruthenium based antimicrobial theranostics — using nanoscopy to identify therapeutic targets and resistance mechanisms in Staphylococcus aureus. Chem. Sci. 11, 70–79 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Silver Lynn, L. Challenges of antibacterial discovery. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 24, 71–109 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

McLean, S. et al. Analysis of the bacterial response to Ru(CO)3Cl(Glycinate) (CORM-3) and the inactivated compound identifies the role played by the ruthenium compound and reveals sulfur-containing species as a major target of CORM-3 action. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 19, 1999–2012 (2013).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Roder, C. & Thomson, M. J. Auranofin: repurposing an old drug for a golden new age. Drugs R. D. 15, 13–20 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Harbut, M. B. et al. Auranofin exerts broad-spectrum bactericidal activities by targeting thiol-redox homeostasis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, 4453–4458 (2015). Important study on the antimicrobial potential of the FDA-approved drug auranofin.

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Wu, B., Yang, X. & Yan, M. Synthesis and structure–activity relationship study of antimicrobial auranofin against ESKAPE pathogens. J. Med. Chem. 62, 7751–7768 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Miyamoto, Y. et al. Gold(I) phosphine derivatives with improved selectivity as topically active drug leads to overcome 5-nitroheterocyclic drug resistance in Trichomonas vaginalis. J. Med. Chem. 64, 6608–6620 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Epstein, T. D., Wu, B., Moulton, K. D., Yan, M. & Dube, D. H. Sugar-modified analogs of auranofin are potent inhibitors of the gastric pathogen Helicobacter pylori. ACS Infect. Dis. 5, 1682–1687 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Liu, Y. et al. Repurposing of the gold drug auranofin and a review of its derivatives as antibacterial therapeutics. Drug Discov. Today 27, 1961–1973 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tharmalingam, N. et al. Auranofin is an effective agent against clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Future Med. Chem. 11, 1417–1425 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Castano, A. P., Mroz, P. & Hamblin, M. R. Photodynamic therapy and anti-tumour immunity. Nat. Rev. Cancer 6, 535–545 (2006).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Dolmans, D. E. J. G. J., Fukumura, D. & Jain, R. K. Photodynamic therapy for cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 3, 380–387 (2003).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

McKenzie, L. K., Bryant, H. E. & Weinstein, J. A. Transition metal complexes as photosensitisers in one- and two-photon photodynamic therapy. Coord. Chem. Rev. 379, 2–29 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Monro, S. et al. Transition metal complexes and photodynamic therapy from a tumor-centered approach: challenges, opportunities, and highlights from the development of TLD1433. Chem. Rev. 119, 797–828 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Rajesh, S., Koshi, E., Philip, K. & Mohan, A. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: an overview. J. Indian. Soc. Periodontol. 15, 323–327 (2011).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cieplik, F. et al. Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy — what we know and what we don't. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 44, 571–589 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Gilaberte, Y., Rezusta, A., Juarranz, A. & Hamblin, M. R. Editorial: antimicrobial photodynamic therapy: a new paradigm in the fight against infections. Front. Med. 8, 788888 (2021).

Article Google Scholar

Maldonado-Carmona, N., Ouk, T.-S. & Leroy-Lhez, S. Latest trends on photodynamic disinfection of Gram-negative bacteria: photosensitizer's structure and delivery systems. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 21, 113–145 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hamblin, M. R. & Abrahamse, H. Can light-based approaches overcome antimicrobial resistance? Drug Dev. Res. 80, 48–67 (2019). Expert viewpoint on the potential of antimicrobial photodynamic therapy, highlighting the potential applications of the treatment modality as well as areas where more research and development is required.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wainwright, M. Photodynamic antimicrobial chemotherapy (PACT). J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 42, 13–28 (1998).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dąbrowski, J. M. et al. Engineering of relevant photodynamic processes through structural modifications of metallotetrapyrrolic photosensitizers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 325, 67–101 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Josefsen, L. B. & Boyle, R. W. Photodynamic therapy and the development of metal-based photosensitisers. Met. Based Drugs 2008, 276109 (2008).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Jain, A., Garrett, N. T. & Malone, Z. P. Ruthenium-based photoactive metalloantibiotics. Photochem. Photobiol. 98, 6–16 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Parakh, P., Gokulakrishnan, S. & Prakash, H. Visible light water disinfection using [Ru(bpy)2(phendione)](PF6)2·2H2O and [Ru(phendione)3]Cl2·2H2O complexes and their effective adsorption onto activated carbon. Sep. Purif. Technol. 109, 9–17 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Arenas, Y. et al. Photodynamic inactivation of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Ru(II)-based type I/type II photosensitizers. Photodiagn. Photodyn. Ther. 10, 615–625 (2013).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Pierce, S., Jennings, M. P., Juliano, S. A. & Angeles-Boza, A. M. Peptide–ruthenium conjugate as an efficient photosensitizer for the inactivation of multidrug-resistant bacteria. Inorg. Chem. 59, 14866–14870 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Jian, Y. et al. An alkynyl-dangling Ru(II) polypyridine complex for targeted antimicrobial photodynamic therapy. Chem. Eur. J. 28, e202103359 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Le Gall, T. et al. Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes as photosensitizers for antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a structure–activity study on clinical bacterial strains. ChemMedChem 13, 2229–2239 (2018).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Frei, A. et al. Synthesis, characterization, and biological evaluation of new Ru(II) polypyridyl photosensitizers for photodynamic therapy. J. Med. Chem. 57, 7280–7292 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Hohlfeld, B. F. et al. Dipyrrinato-iridium(III) complexes for application in photodynamic therapy and antimicrobial photodynamic inactivation. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 6440–6459 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Wang, L. et al. Heteroleptic Ir(III)N6 complexes with long-lived triplet excited states and in vitro photobiological activities. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 3629–3644 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Ho, P.-Y. et al. Fluorescence imaging and photodynamic inactivation of bacteria based on cationic cyclometalated iridium(III) complexes with aggregation-induced emission properties. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 10, 2100706 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Hopkins, S. L. et al. Visible light induced antibacterial properties of a Ru(II)–Pt(II) bimetallic complex. Inorg. Chim. Acta 454, 229–233 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Jain, A., Winkel, B. S. & Brewer, K. J. In vivo inhibition of E. coli growth by a Ru(II)/Pt(II) supramolecule [(tpy)RuCl(dpp)PtCl2](PF6). J. Inorg. Biochem. 101, 1525–1528 (2007).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Appleby, M. V. et al. Cu(I) diimine complexes as immobilised antibacterial photosensitisers operating in water under visible light. Mater. Adv. 1, 3417–3427 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Sun, W. et al. Fluorination in enhancing photoactivated antibacterial activity of Ru(II) complexes with photo-labile ligands. RSC Adv. 10, 25364–25369 (2020).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

de Sousa, A. P. et al. An unusual bidentate methionine ruthenium(II) complex: photo-uncaging and antimicrobial activity. J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 25, 419–428 (2020).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Smith, N. A. et al. Combatting AMR: photoactivatable ruthenium(II)-isoniazid complex exhibits rapid selective antimycobacterial activity. Chem. Sci. 8, 395–404 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Garner, R. N., Pierce, C. G., Reed, C. R. & Brennessel, W. W. Photoinitiated treatment of Mycobacterium using Ru(II) isoniazid complexes. Inorg. Chim. Acta 461, 261–266 (2017).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Fairlamb, I. J. S. & Lynam, J. M. in Advances in Bioorganometallic Chemistry (eds Hirao, T. & Moriuchi, T.) 137–154 (Elsevier, 2019).

Ward, J. S. in Comprehensive Organometallic Chemistry IV Vol. 15 (eds Parkin, G., Meyer, K. & O’Hare, D.) 314–330 (Elsevier, 2022).

Flanagan, L. et al. The antimicrobial activity of a carbon monoxide releasing molecule (EBOR-CORM-1) is shaped by intraspecific variation within Pseudomonas aeruginosa populations. Front. Microbiol. 9, 00195 (2018).

Article Google Scholar

Ward, J. S., Morgan, R., Lynam, J. M., Fairlamb, I. J. S. & Moir, J. W. B. Toxicity of tryptophan manganese(I) carbonyl (Trypto-CORM), against Neisseria gonorrhoeae. MedChemComm 8, 346–352 (2017).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Desmard, M. et al. A carbon monoxide-releasing molecule (CORM-3) exerts bactericidal activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and improves survival in an animal model of bacteraemia. FASEB J. 23, 1023–1031 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Tavares, A. F. et al. The bactericidal activity of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules against Helicobacter pylori. PLoS ONE 8, e83157 (2013).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Murray, T. S. et al. The carbon monoxide releasing molecule CORM-2 attenuates Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 7, e35499 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Cheng, J. et al. Red light-triggered intracellular carbon monoxide release enables selective eradication of MRSA infection. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 13513–13520 (2021).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cheng, J. & Hu, J. Recent advances on carbon monoxide releasing molecules for antibacterial applications. ChemMedChem 16, 3628–3634 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ordonez, A. A. et al. Molecular imaging of bacterial infections: overcoming the barriers to clinical translation. Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaax8251 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

van Oosten, M. et al. Targeted imaging of bacterial infections: advances, hurdles and hopes. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 39, 892–916 (2015).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Welling, M. M. et al. Fluorescent imaging of bacterial infections and recent advances made with multimodal radiopharmaceuticals. Clin. Transl. Imaging 7, 125–138 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Sollini, M. et al. Current status of molecular imaging in infections. Curr. Pharm. Des. 24, 754–771 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ballinger, J. R. & Gnanasegaran, G. Radiolabelled leukocytes for imaging inflammation: how radiochemistry affects clinical use. Q. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 49, 308–318 (2005).

CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Welling, M. M. et al. An update on radiotracer development for molecular imaging of bacterial infections. Clin. Transl. Imaging 7, 105–124 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Eggleston, H. & Panizzi, P. Molecular imaging of bacterial infections in vivo: the discrimination between infection and inflammation. Informatics 1, 72–99 (2014).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Langer, O. et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluation of [18F]ciprofloxacin for the imaging of bacterial infections with PET. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 32, 143–150 (2005).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Ferro-Flores, G., Avila-Rodríguez, M. A. & García-Pérez, F. O. Imaging of bacteria with radiolabeled ubiquicidin by SPECT and PET techniques. Clin. Transl. Imaging 4, 175–182 (2016).

Article Google Scholar

Roohi, S., Mushtaq, A. & Malik, S. A. Synthesis and biodistribution of 99mTc-vancomycin in a model of bacterial infection. Radiochim. Acta 93, 415–418 (2005).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Liu, X. et al. Radiolabeled Zn-DPA as a potential infection imaging agent. Nucl. Med. Biol. 39, 709–714 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Rice, D. R. et al. Evaluation of [¹¹¹In]-labeled zinc-dipicolylamine tracers for SPECT imaging of bacterial infection. Mol. Imaging Biol. 17, 204–213 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Petrik, M. et al. 68Ga-triacetylfusarinine C and 68Ga-ferrioxamine E for Aspergillus infection imaging: uptake specificity in various microorganisms. Mol. Imaging Biol. 16, 102–108 (2014).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Petrik, M. et al. Imaging of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection with Ga-68 labelled pyoverdine for positron emission tomography. Sci. Rep. 8, 15698 (2018).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Petrik, M. et al. (68)Ga-labelled desferrioxamine-B for bacterial infection imaging. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 48, 372–382 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Peukert, C. et al. Optimization of artificial siderophores as 68Ga-complexed PET tracers for in vivo imaging of bacterial infections. J. Med. Chem. 64, 12359–12378 (2021). Promising use of a siderophore to specifically deliver 68Ga to bacteria as an imaging agent for positron-emission tomography.

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Klug, D. et al. There is no market for new antibiotics: this allows an open approach to research and development. Wellcome Open Res. 6, 146 (2021).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Brammer, J. C. et al. TUCAN: a molecular identifier and descriptor applicable to the whole periodic table from hydrogen to oganesson. J. Cheminform. 14, 66 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Krenn, M. et al. SELFIES and the future of molecular string representations. Patterns 3, 100588 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Medina-Franco, J. L. et al. Bridging informatics and medicinal inorganic chemistry: toward a database of metallodrugs and metallodrug candidates. Drug Discov. Today 27, 1420–1430 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Fu, C. et al. Discovery of polypyridyl iridium(III) complexes as potent agents against resistant Candida albicans. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 233, 114250 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Dougan, S. J., Habtemariam, A., McHale, S. E., Parsons, S. & Sadler, P. J. Catalytic organometallic anticancer complexes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 11628–11633 (2008).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Soldevila-Barreda, J. J. & Metzler-Nolte, N. Intracellular catalysis with selected metal complexes and metallic nanoparticles: advances toward the development of catalytic metallodrugs. Chem. Rev. 119, 829–869 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Weng, C., Shen, L. & Ang, W. H. Harnessing endogenous formate for antibacterial prodrug activation by in cellulo ruthenium-mediated transfer hydrogenation reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59, 9314–9318 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Monitoring Global Progress on Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance: Analysis Report of the Second Round of Results of AMR Country Self-Assessment Survey (The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, the World Organisation for Animal Health and the World Health Organization. 2018).

McKenna, M. The antibiotic paradox: why companies can't afford to create life-saving drugs. Nature 584, 338–341 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Shlaes, D. M. The economic conundrum for antibacterial drugs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 64, e02057-19 (2019).

Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Patra, M. et al. Synthesis and biological evaluation of chromium bioorganometallics based on the antibiotic platensimycin lead structure. ChemMedChem 4, 1930–1938 (2009).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Edwards, E. I., Epton, R. & Marr, G. Organometallic derivatives of penicillins and cephalosporins a new class of semi-synthetic antibiotics. J. Organomet. Chem. 85, C23–C25 (1975).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Frei, A. et al. Nontoxic cobalt(III) Schiff base complexes with broad-spectrum antifungal activity. Chem. Eur. J. 27, 2021–2029 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Low, M. L. et al. Conjugation of a new series of dithiocarbazate Schiff base copper(II) complexes with vectors selected to enhance antibacterial activity. Bioconjug. Chem. 25, 2269–2284 (2014).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Yang, X.-Y. et al. Dirhodium (II) complex interferes with iron-transport system to exert antibacterial action against Streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Proteom. 194, 160–167 (2019).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Kalaivani, P. et al. Influence of terminal substitution on structural, DNA, protein binding, anticancer and antibacterial activities of palladium(II) complexes containing 3-methoxy salicylaldehyde-4(N) substituted thiosemicarbazones. Dalton Trans. 41, 2486–2499 (2012).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Mohamed, H. A., Lake, B. R. M., Laing, T., Phillips, R. M. & Willans, C. E. Synthesis and anticancer activity of silver(I)–N-heterocyclic carbene complexes derived from the natural xanthine products caffeine, theophylline and theobromine. Dalton Trans. 44, 7563–7569 (2015).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Chen, X.-B. et al. The first organometallic carbonyl tungsten complex of antibacterial drug norfloxacin. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 7, 1302–1305 (2004).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Cooper, S. M. et al. Synthesis and anti-microbial activity of a new series of bis(diphosphine) rhenium(V) dioxo complex. Dalton Trans. 51, 12791–12795 (2022).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Smitten, K. L., Scattergood, P. A., Kiker, C., Thomas, J. A. & Elliott, P. I. P. Triazole-based osmium(II) complexes displaying red/near-IR luminescence: antimicrobial activity and super-resolution imaging. Chem. Sci. 11, 8928–8935 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chen, F. et al. Biguanide iridium(III) complexes with potent antimicrobial activity. J. Med. Chem. 61, 7330–7344 (2018).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Frei, A. et al. Platinum cyclooctadiene complexes with activity against Gram-positive bacteria. ChemMedChem 16, 3165–3171 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Chakraborty, P. et al. An organogold compound as potential antimicrobial agent against drug-resistant bacteria: initial mechanistic insights. ChemMedChem 16, 3060–3070 (2021).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Sanseverino, I., Loos, R., Navarro Cuenca, A., Marinov, D. & Lettieri, T. State of the Art on the Contribution of Water to Antimicrobial Resistance, EUR 29592 EN (Publications Office of the European Commission, 2019).

Tovmasyan, A., Batinic-Haberle, I. & Benov, L. Antibacterial activity of synthetic cationic iron porphyrins. Antioxidants 9, 972 (2020).

Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

Mantareva, V., Kussovski, V., Durmuş, M., Borisova, E. & Angelov, I. Photodynamic inactivation of pathogenic species Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Candida albicans with lutetium (III) acetate phthalocyanines and specific light irradiation. Lasers Med. Sci. 31, 1591–1598 (2016).

Article PubMed Google Scholar

Skwor, T. A. et al. Photodynamic inactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli: a metalloporphyrin comparison. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol. 165, 51–57 (2016).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Lourenço, L. M. O. et al. Photoinactivation of planktonic and biofilm forms of Escherichia coli through the action of cationic zinc(II) phthalocyanines. ChemPhotoChem 3, 251–260 (2019).

Article Google Scholar

Berezin, D. B., Makarov, V. V., Znoyko, S. A., Mayzlish, V. E. & Kustov, A. V. Aggregation of water soluble octaanionic phthalocyanines and their photoinactivation antimicrobial effect in vitro. Mendeleev Commun. 30, 621–623 (2020).

Article CAS Google Scholar

Feng, Y., Sun, W.-Z., Wang, X.-S. & Zhou, Q.-X. Selective photoinactivation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by highly positively charged RuII complexes. Chem. Eur. J. 25, 13879–13884 (2019).

Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar

Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. CLSI Supplement M100, 32nd edn. https://clsi.org/standards/products/microbiology/documents/m100/ (Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2022).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing, 2023); http://www.eucast.org/ast_of_bacteria

Download references

The CO-ADD screening described in this Review, which led to our focus on metalloantibiotics, was supported by the Wellcome Trust (UK; Strategic Funding Award: 104797/Z/14/Z) and The University of Queensland (Australia; Strategic Funding), which included salary support for M.A.T.B., A.G.E. and J.Z. A.F. thanks the SNSF for an Early Postdoc Mobility Fellowship (P2ZHP2_177997) that supported his work at The University of Queensland. A.D.V. is currently supported by an Australian National Health and Medical Research Council Ideas Grant (2004367), and A.G.E. and J.Z. are supported by the Combating Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria Biopharmaceutical Accelerator (04CARB-X-X064).

Community for Open Antimicrobial Drug Discovery, Centre for Superbug Solutions, Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland, Australia

Angelo Frei, Anthony D. Verderosa, Alysha G. Elliott, Johannes Zuegg & Mark A. T. Blaskovich

Department of Chemistry, Biochemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Angelo Frei

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

M.A.T.B. proposed the initial structure of the Review, with contributions from all authors. A.F. drafted the introduction, ‘Metalloantibiotics’ and ‘Photoactivated metal complexes’ sections, with J.Z. contributing to the ‘Photoactivated metal complexes’ section. M.A.T.B. drafted the ‘Metals and bacteria’, ‘Zinc ionophores’ and ‘Metal complexes for imaging infections’ sections. A.D.V. drafted the description of the strategies based on uptake (‘Metallophores’). A.G.E. contributed to the section ‘Metals and bacteria’. All authors edited the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Angelo Frei or Mark A. T. Blaskovich.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Nature Reviews Chemistry thanks Raymond Turner, Grażyna Stochel, Sajjad Hussain Sumrra and Agnieszka Kyzioł for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher's note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This arises when microorganisms are able to either intrinsically resist, or evolve to resist, the effects of antimicrobial agents.

Despite the lack of an agreed-upon definition in the literature, this is probably most accurately defined as ‘any compounds that are not organic’.

A molecule that increases the permeability of lipid membranes to specific ions.

A metal complex with antimicrobial properties.

Low-molecular-mass organic ligands that are produced by microorganisms such as bacteria and fungi, to supply metal-ion nutrients to the organism.

Metal complexes or coordination complexes consist of one (or multiple) central metal atoms or ions and surrounding bound molecules or ions referred to as ligands.

The lowest concentration of a compound required to inhibit visible growth of a microorganism, following overnight incubation in the presence of the microorganism.

Although officially defined as any compounds containing a covalent carbon–metal bond, this description is often mistakenly generalized to all metal complexes that have organic ligands.

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and Permissions

Frei, A., Verderosa, A.D., Elliott, A.G. et al. Metals to combat antimicrobial resistance. Nat Rev Chem 7, 202–224 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00463-4

Download citation

Accepted: 06 January 2023

Published: 08 February 2023

Issue Date: March 2023

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-023-00463-4

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery (2023)